vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR) and Lovesac Co (LOVE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Borr Drilling Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($267.7M vs $150.2M, roughly 1.8× Lovesac Co). Borr Drilling Ltd runs the higher net margin — 13.1% vs -7.0%, a 20.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Lovesac Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.2% vs -1.5%).
Borr Drilling Ltd is a global offshore drilling contractor owning and operating a modern fleet of high-spec jack-up rigs. It offers drilling services to oil and gas exploration and production firms, with main operations across the North Sea, Southeast Asia, Middle East, and West Africa for shallow-water and marginal field projects.
The Lovesac Company is an American furniture retailer, specializing in a patented modular furniture system called Sactionals. Sactionals consist of two combinable pieces, “Seats” and “Sides,” as well as custom-fit covers and associated accessories. Lovesac also sells Sacs, a bag seat filled with a proprietary foam mixture.
BORR vs LOVE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $267.7M | $150.2M |
| Net Profit | $35.1M | $-10.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 56.1% |
| Operating Margin | 36.0% | -10.5% |
| Net Margin | 13.1% | -7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.5% | 0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.7% | -114.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | $-0.72 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $150.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $160.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $267.7M | $138.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $241.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $149.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $156.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $271.9M | $132.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $250.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-10.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-6.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $35.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $31.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 56.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 53.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 60.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 58.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 59.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 54.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 59.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.0% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.4% | -13.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | -7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | -9.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.72 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.38 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $-0.83 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $92.4M | $23.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $189.3M |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $495.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $23.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | $26.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $83.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $61.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $72.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.3M | $72.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $87.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $189.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $197.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $201.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $216.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $196.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $202.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $999.2M | $205.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $217.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $495.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $493.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $483.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $532.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $499.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $481.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $477.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $482.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.3M | $-4.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-10.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -6.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.18× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-13.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $-41.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $44.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $56.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-10.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $38.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-6.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $119.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-14.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $49.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | -6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -36.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 19.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.82× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BORR
| Transferred Over Time | $256.6M | 96% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $11.1M | 4% |
LOVE
| Showrooms | $102.7M | 68% |
| Internet | $37.3M | 25% |
| Other | $10.2M | 7% |
