vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR) and ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd (OSW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Borr Drilling Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($267.7M vs $242.1M, roughly 1.1× ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd). Borr Drilling Ltd runs the higher net margin — 13.1% vs 5.0%, a 8.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs -1.5%).
Borr Drilling Ltd is a global offshore drilling contractor owning and operating a modern fleet of high-spec jack-up rigs. It offers drilling services to oil and gas exploration and production firms, with main operations across the North Sea, Southeast Asia, Middle East, and West Africa for shallow-water and marginal field projects.
BORR vs OSW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $267.7M | $242.1M |
| Net Profit | $35.1M | $12.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 36.0% | 6.8% |
| Net Margin | 13.1% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.5% | 11.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.7% | -16.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | $0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $242.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $258.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $267.7M | $240.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $219.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $217.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $241.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $271.9M | $224.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $211.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $12.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $19.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $21.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $15.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $21.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.0% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.4% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $0.15 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $92.4M | $16.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $84.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $542.6M |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $707.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $29.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $57.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $48.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.3M | $62.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $65.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $84.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $85.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $96.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $97.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $98.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $98.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $123.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $138.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $542.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $552.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $548.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $530.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $554.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $540.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $999.2M | $532.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $515.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $707.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $732.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $731.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $708.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $746.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $734.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $756.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $763.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.27× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.3M | $20.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $14.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.18× | 1.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $68.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $20.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $20.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $16.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $18.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $15.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $27.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $13.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | 1.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 1.19× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BORR
| Transferred Over Time | $256.6M | 96% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $11.1M | 4% |
OSW
| Services | $197.3M | 82% |
| Products | $44.8M | 18% |
