vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR) and STURM RUGER & CO INC (RGR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Borr Drilling Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($267.7M vs $151.1M, roughly 1.8× STURM RUGER & CO INC). On growth, STURM RUGER & CO INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.6% vs -1.5%).
Borr Drilling Ltd is a global offshore drilling contractor owning and operating a modern fleet of high-spec jack-up rigs. It offers drilling services to oil and gas exploration and production firms, with main operations across the North Sea, Southeast Asia, Middle East, and West Africa for shallow-water and marginal field projects.
Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc., better known by the shortened name Ruger, is an American firearm manufacturing company based in Southport, Connecticut, with production facilities also in Newport, New Hampshire; Mayodan, North Carolina; and Prescott, Arizona. The company was founded in 1949 by Alexander McCormick Sturm and William B. Ruger and has been publicly traded since 1969.
BORR vs RGR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $267.7M | $151.1M |
| Net Profit | $35.1M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 17.8% |
| Operating Margin | 36.0% | 2.3% |
| Net Margin | 13.1% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -1.5% | 3.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | $0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $151.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $126.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $267.7M | $132.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $135.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $145.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $122.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $271.9M | $130.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $136.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $-17.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $8.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 22.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 21.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.0% | -15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.4% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | -13.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | $-1.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.62 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $0.47 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $92.4M | $92.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $283.8M |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $342.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $92.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $80.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | $101.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $108.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $105.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $96.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.3M | $105.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $115.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $283.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $279.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $289.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $321.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $319.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $314.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $999.2M | $321.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $332.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $342.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $342.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $349.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $379.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $384.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $373.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $376.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $385.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.3M | $15.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $12.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.18× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $38.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $15.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $18.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $16.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 2.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BORR
| Transferred Over Time | $256.6M | 96% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $11.1M | 4% |
RGR
| Firearms | $150.6M | 100% |
| Castings | $7.3M | 5% |
