vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR) and TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC (TR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Borr Drilling Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($267.7M vs $196.3M, roughly 1.4× TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC). TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 14.7% vs 13.1%, a 1.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.5% vs -1.5%).
Borr Drilling Ltd is a global offshore drilling contractor owning and operating a modern fleet of high-spec jack-up rigs. It offers drilling services to oil and gas exploration and production firms, with main operations across the North Sea, Southeast Asia, Middle East, and West Africa for shallow-water and marginal field projects.
Tootsie Roll Industries is an American manufacturer of confectionery based in Chicago, Illinois. Its best-known products include the namesake Tootsie Rolls and Tootsie Pops. Tootsie Roll Industries currently markets its brands internationally in Canada, Mexico, and over 75 other countries.
BORR vs TR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $267.7M | $196.3M |
| Net Profit | $35.1M | $28.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.7% |
| Operating Margin | 36.0% | 17.0% |
| Net Margin | 13.1% | 14.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.5% | 1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.7% | 27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $196.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $232.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $267.7M | $155.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $148.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $193.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $225.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $271.9M | $150.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $153.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $32.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $15.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $15.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 36.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 39.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 32.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.4% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $92.4M | $176.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $941.0M |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $176.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $119.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | $170.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $176.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $194.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $163.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.3M | $131.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $159.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $941.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $918.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $893.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $879.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $870.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $870.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $999.2M | $841.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $834.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.3M | $73.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $61.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 31.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 6.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.18× | 2.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $96.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $73.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $62.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $68.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $-12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $21.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $61.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $50.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $750.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $64.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $55.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $16.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 31.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | -0.49× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | -0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.35× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BORR
| Transferred Over Time | $256.6M | 96% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $11.1M | 4% |
TR
| Products | $194.3M | 99% |
| Rental And Royalty | $1.9M | 1% |
