vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BOS BETTER ONLINE SOLUTIONS LTD (BOSC) and Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($37.8M vs $26.6M, roughly 1.4× BOS BETTER ONLINE SOLUTIONS LTD). BOS BETTER ONLINE SOLUTIONS LTD runs the higher net margin — 8.0% vs 0.1%, a 7.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BOS BETTER ONLINE SOLUTIONS LTD posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (34.6% vs 28.8%).
B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. is a publicly traded company, headquartered in Israel, that provides RFID and supply chain solutions. Its shares are traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market.
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. is a specialty insurance holding company that offers a broad portfolio of property and casualty insurance products, with a core focus on residential and commercial flood insurance for customers across the United States. It serves both individual consumers and small to mid-sized business clients, using advanced data analytics to support accurate policy pricing and robust risk management.
BOSC vs NP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.6M | $37.8M |
| Net Profit | $2.1M | $50.0K |
| Gross Margin | 23.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 6.8% | — |
| Net Margin | 8.0% | 0.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 34.6% | 28.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 70.2% | 0.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $37.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $44.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $33.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $50.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 46.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 58.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.21 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $24.2M | — |
| Total Assets | $38.4M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $247.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-509.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-374.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $89.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.8M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.69× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $38.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $320.0K | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.0K | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.38× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.26× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
