vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Boxlight Corp (BOXL) and ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC (OSUR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Boxlight Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($29.3M vs $26.8M, roughly 1.1× ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC). Boxlight Corp runs the higher net margin — -21.1% vs -72.1%, a 51.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Boxlight Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-19.2% vs -28.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Boxlight Corp's revenue compounded faster (-23.1% CAGR vs -29.7%).
Boxlight Corp is a global provider of interactive technology solutions, including interactive flat panel displays, projectors, collaborative software, and classroom technology accessories. It primarily serves K-12 and higher education institutions, as well as corporate and government customers across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific, focusing on enhancing learning and work collaboration efficiency.
OraSure Technologies, Inc. is a Bethlehem, Pennsylvania–based company in the medical device industry. Their products include diagnostic testing kits. The company had recently developed OraQuick testing kit, the first over-the-counter home HIV test.
BOXL vs OSUR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $29.3M | $26.8M |
| Net Profit | $-6.2M | $-19.3M |
| Gross Margin | 29.1% | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | -13.4% | -75.1% |
| Net Margin | -21.1% | -72.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -19.2% | -28.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -102.0% | -78.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.88 | $-0.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $26.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.3M | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.9M | $31.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $29.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.0M | $37.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.3M | $39.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.5M | $54.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.1M | $54.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-19.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.2M | $-13.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.7M | $-19.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-16.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.7M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.1M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.5M | $-615.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.1M | $-3.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.1% | 43.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.0% | 42.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.6% | 36.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.8% | 42.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.7% | 45.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.5% | 44.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -75.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -13.4% | -59.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.7% | -57.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -59.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -67.6% | -33.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.4% | -15.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | -5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.7% | -13.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -72.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -21.1% | -50.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.3% | -63.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -53.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -69.6% | -28.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.4% | -11.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.8% | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -19.1% | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.88 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.53 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-87.29 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.72 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.92 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.76 | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $11.8M | $199.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $36.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-19.5M | $340.8M |
| Total Assets | $99.6M | $403.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $199.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.8M | $216.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.6M | $234.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $247.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0M | $267.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.5M | $278.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5M | $267.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.8M | $263.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $340.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.5M | $362.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.6M | $380.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $396.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-12.9M | $410.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $425.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5M | $425.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.1M | $426.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $403.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.6M | $423.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.2M | $445.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $457.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $479.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.9M | $464.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.3M | $466.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $142.4M | $467.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.93× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.38× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.23× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.3M | $-9.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-9.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -37.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-53.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-9.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-19.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6M | $109.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2M | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.4M | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.9M | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-11.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-20.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-347.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | -37.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -38.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -67.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.9% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BOXL
| Products | $27.4M | 93% |
| Services | $2.0M | 7% |
OSUR
| Product And Services | $24.9M | 93% |
| Other | $1.9M | 7% |
