vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) and Masco (MAS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Masco is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.7B, roughly 1.1× Broadridge Financial Solutions). Broadridge Financial Solutions runs the higher net margin — 16.6% vs 11.9%, a 4.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Masco posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.5% vs -5.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Broadridge Financial Solutions's revenue compounded faster (10.4% CAGR vs -4.2%).
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. is a public corporate services and financial technology company. Headquartered in Lake Success, New York, the company was founded in 2007 as a spin-off from Automatic Data Processing. Broadridge supplies companies in the financial industry with financial documents such as proxy statements and annual reports, as well as shareholder communications solutions such as virtual annual meetings.
Masco Corporation is an American manufacturer of products for the home improvement and new home construction markets. Comprising more than 20 companies, the Masco conglomerate operates nearly 60 manufacturing facilities in the United States and over 20 in other parts of the world. Since 1969 it trades on the NYSE. Under the leadership of Richard Manoogian, the company grew exponentially and subsequently joined the Fortune 500 list of largest U.S. corporations.
BR vs MAS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $284.6M | $228.0M |
| Gross Margin | 27.6% | 35.8% |
| Operating Margin | 12.0% | 16.5% |
| Net Margin | 16.6% | 11.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.4% | 6.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 17.1% | 14.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.42 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $228.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $284.6M | $165.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $189.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $374.2M | $270.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $243.1M | $186.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $142.4M | $182.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.8M | $167.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $323.2M | $258.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.6% | 33.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.3% | 37.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.8% | 35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.9% | 34.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | 36.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.5% | 37.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.0% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.1% | 20.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.0% | 15.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.3% | 15.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 18.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.7% | 19.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.6% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.1% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.4% | 10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.6% | 12.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.42 | $0.81 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.90 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.17 | $1.28 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.05 | $0.87 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.20 | $0.85 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.68 | $0.77 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.72 | $1.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $371.5M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | $2.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.9B | $27.0M |
| Total Assets | $8.6B | $5.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.10× | 109.07× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $371.5M | $647.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $559.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $562.2M | $390.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $317.9M | $377.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $290.6M | $634.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $293.5M | $646.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.2M | $398.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $27.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $-185.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-78.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $-84.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $-254.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $-279.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $-88.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $-26.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.6B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.5B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3B | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.0B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2B | $5.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 109.07× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.22× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.55× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BR
| Recurring Fee Revenue Investor Communication Solutions | $589.5M | 34% |
| Recurring Fee Revenue Capital Markets | $300.9M | 18% |
| Recurring Fee Revenue Regulatory | $248.7M | 15% |
| Recurring Fee Revenue Customer Communications | $189.2M | 11% |
| Recurring Fee Revenue Wealth And Investment Management | $179.7M | 10% |
| Recurring Fee Revenue Data Driven Fund Solutions | $112.7M | 7% |
| Event Driven Revenue Mutual Funds | $51.4M | 3% |
| Event Driven Revenue Equity And Other | $39.2M | 2% |
| Global Technology And Operations | $7.5M | 0% |
MAS
Segment breakdown not available.
