vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) and THOMSON REUTERS CORP (TRI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

THOMSON REUTERS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.7B, roughly 1.0× Broadridge Financial Solutions). THOMSON REUTERS CORP runs the higher net margin — 17.5% vs 16.6%, a 0.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, THOMSON REUTERS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.6% vs -5.4%).

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. is a public corporate services and financial technology company. Headquartered in Lake Success, New York, the company was founded in 2007 as a spin-off from Automatic Data Processing. Broadridge supplies companies in the financial industry with financial documents such as proxy statements and annual reports, as well as shareholder communications solutions such as virtual annual meetings.

The second and current incarnation of News Corporation, doing business as News Corp, is an American mass media and publishing company headquartered at 1211 Avenue of the Americas in Midtown Manhattan, New York City. The company was formed on June 28, 2013, as a spin-off of the first News Corporation, whose legal successor was 21st Century Fox, which held its media and entertainment assets. Operating across digital real estate information, news media, book publishing, and cable television, New...

BR vs TRI — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TRI
TRI
1.0× larger
TRI
$1.8B
$1.7B
BR
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TRI
TRI
+8.0% gap
TRI
2.6%
-5.4%
BR
Higher net margin
TRI
TRI
0.9% more per $
TRI
17.5%
16.6%
BR

Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025

Metric
BR
BR
TRI
TRI
Revenue
$1.7B
$1.8B
Net Profit
$284.6M
$313.0M
Gross Margin
27.6%
Operating Margin
12.0%
24.4%
Net Margin
16.6%
17.5%
Revenue YoY
-5.4%
2.6%
Net Profit YoY
17.1%
-62.8%
EPS (diluted)
$2.42
$0.69

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BR
BR
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
$1.7B
Q2 25
$2.1B
$1.8B
Q1 25
$1.8B
Q4 24
$1.6B
Q3 24
$1.4B
Q2 24
$1.9B
$1.7B
Q1 24
$1.7B
Q4 23
$1.4B
Net Profit
BR
BR
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
$284.6M
Q2 25
$374.2M
$313.0M
Q1 25
$243.1M
Q4 24
$142.4M
Q3 24
$79.8M
Q2 24
$323.2M
$841.0M
Q1 24
$213.7M
Q4 23
$70.3M
Gross Margin
BR
BR
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
27.6%
Q2 25
37.3%
Q1 25
31.8%
Q4 24
27.9%
Q3 24
24.5%
Q2 24
35.5%
Q1 24
31.2%
Q4 23
24.8%
Operating Margin
BR
BR
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
12.0%
Q2 25
24.1%
24.4%
Q1 25
19.0%
Q4 24
13.3%
Q3 24
9.4%
Q2 24
22.7%
23.9%
Q1 24
17.5%
Q4 23
8.9%
Net Margin
BR
BR
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
16.6%
Q2 25
18.1%
17.5%
Q1 25
13.4%
Q4 24
9.0%
Q3 24
5.6%
Q2 24
16.6%
48.3%
Q1 24
12.4%
Q4 23
5.0%
EPS (diluted)
BR
BR
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
$2.42
Q2 25
$3.17
$0.69
Q1 25
$2.05
Q4 24
$1.20
Q3 24
$0.68
Q2 24
$2.72
$1.86
Q1 24
$1.79
Q4 23
$0.59

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BR
BR
TRI
TRI
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$371.5M
$664.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$3.2B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$2.9B
$12.6B
Total Assets
$8.6B
$18.0B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.10×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BR
BR
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
$371.5M
Q2 25
$562.2M
$664.0M
Q1 25
$317.9M
Q4 24
$290.6M
Q3 24
$293.5M
Q2 24
$305.2M
$1.7B
Q1 24
$236.4M
Q4 23
$277.7M
Total Debt
BR
BR
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
$3.2B
Q2 25
$3.3B
Q1 25
$3.4B
Q4 24
$3.7B
Q3 24
$3.6B
Q2 24
$3.4B
Q1 24
$3.5B
Q4 23
$3.7B
Stockholders' Equity
BR
BR
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
$2.9B
Q2 25
$2.7B
$12.6B
Q1 25
$2.4B
Q4 24
$2.2B
Q3 24
$2.2B
Q2 24
$2.2B
$11.6B
Q1 24
$2.3B
Q4 23
$2.1B
Total Assets
BR
BR
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
$8.6B
Q2 25
$8.5B
$18.0B
Q1 25
$8.3B
Q4 24
$8.2B
Q3 24
$8.0B
Q2 24
$8.2B
$18.4B
Q1 24
$8.2B
Q4 23
$8.0B
Debt / Equity
BR
BR
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
1.10×
Q2 25
1.22×
Q1 25
1.44×
Q4 24
1.64×
Q3 24
1.63×
Q2 24
1.55×
Q1 24
1.55×
Q4 23
1.77×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BR
BR
TRI
TRI
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$746.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.38×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BR
BR
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
Q2 25
$699.7M
$746.0M
Q1 25
$360.4M
Q4 24
$236.7M
Q3 24
$-125.5M
Q2 24
$721.0M
$705.0M
Q1 24
$207.4M
Q4 23
$189.8M
Free Cash Flow
BR
BR
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
Q2 25
$684.1M
Q1 25
$348.9M
Q4 24
$227.9M
Q3 24
$-133.4M
Q2 24
$703.2M
Q1 24
$184.6M
Q4 23
$177.7M
FCF Margin
BR
BR
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
Q2 25
33.1%
Q1 25
19.3%
Q4 24
14.3%
Q3 24
-9.4%
Q2 24
36.2%
Q1 24
10.7%
Q4 23
12.6%
Capex Intensity
BR
BR
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
Q2 25
0.8%
Q1 25
0.6%
Q4 24
0.6%
Q3 24
0.6%
Q2 24
0.9%
Q1 24
1.3%
Q4 23
0.9%
Cash Conversion
BR
BR
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
Q2 25
1.87×
2.38×
Q1 25
1.48×
Q4 24
1.66×
Q3 24
-1.57×
Q2 24
2.23×
0.84×
Q1 24
0.97×
Q4 23
2.70×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BR
BR

Recurring Fee Revenue Investor Communication Solutions$589.5M34%
Recurring Fee Revenue Capital Markets$300.9M18%
Recurring Fee Revenue Regulatory$248.7M15%
Recurring Fee Revenue Customer Communications$189.2M11%
Recurring Fee Revenue Wealth And Investment Management$179.7M10%
Recurring Fee Revenue Data Driven Fund Solutions$112.7M7%
Event Driven Revenue Mutual Funds$51.4M3%
Event Driven Revenue Equity And Other$39.2M2%
Global Technology And Operations$7.5M0%

TRI
TRI

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons