vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Black Rock Coffee Bar, Inc. (BRCB) and Gloo Holdings, Inc. (GLOO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Black Rock Coffee Bar, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($51.5M vs $32.6M, roughly 1.6× Gloo Holdings, Inc.). Black Rock Coffee Bar, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -1.4% vs -116.9%, a 115.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. Black Rock Coffee Bar, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-25.8M vs $-63.4M).
Black Rock Coffee Bar, Inc. is a U.S.-based specialty coffee retail chain that offers handcrafted premium coffee beverages, energy drinks, baked goods, and light snacks. It operates in-store and drive-thru locations primarily across western U.S. states, prioritizing high-quality customizable products and community-focused consumer experiences.
BRCB vs GLOO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $51.5M | $32.6M |
| Net Profit | $-712.0K | $-38.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -12.4% | -82.0% |
| Net Margin | -1.4% | -116.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 12.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.05 | $-6.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $32.6M | $15.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $20.0M | $176.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $43.0M | $-444.4M |
| Total Assets | $323.2M | $206.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.46× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $176.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-444.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $206.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $323.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.46× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.9M | $-63.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-25.8M | $-63.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -50.2% | -194.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 44.5% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-63.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-25.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -194.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -50.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.5% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BRCB
Segment breakdown not available.
GLOO
| Platform Solutions | $12.7M | 39% |
| Advertising | $11.1M | 34% |
| Marketplace | $3.9M | 12% |
| Midwestern Acquisition | $2.7M | 8% |
| Servant Acquisition | $1.8M | 6% |
