vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Borealis Foods Inc. (BRLS) and Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana (HFBL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Borealis Foods Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.1M vs $6.0M, roughly 1.2× Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana). Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana runs the higher net margin — 27.8% vs -53.2%, a 81.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.2% vs -12.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana's revenue compounded faster (10.7% CAGR vs -2.4%).
Borealis Foods Inc is a food technology enterprise specializing in developing and producing high-quality plant-based protein products including plant-based meat alternatives. It mainly serves retail and food service customers across North America and Europe, focusing on delivering affordable, nutritious sustainable food options matching the taste of conventional animal-derived meat.
Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana is a U.S. bank holding company based in Louisiana. It operates community banking services via its subsidiary, offering retail customers and local small businesses a full suite of financial products including deposit accounts, consumer loans, mortgage loans, and commercial financing, primarily serving local markets across Louisiana.
BRLS vs HFBL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.1M | $6.0M |
| Net Profit | $-3.8M | $1.7M |
| Gross Margin | 14.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -27.1% | 35.1% |
| Net Margin | -53.2% | 27.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -12.0% | 18.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.8% | 64.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | $0.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8M | $5.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1M | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5M | $4.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.9M | $4.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.8M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.6M | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.2M | $748.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.8M | $1.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.8M | $941.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.3M | $638.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.4M | $732.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.1% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -46.7% | 27.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -42.6% | 18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -68.4% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -44.8% | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -94.8% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -88.3% | 18.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -53.2% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -64.0% | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -61.2% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -85.3% | 20.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -59.8% | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -115.0% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -106.8% | 14.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.18 | $0.52 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.21 | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.82 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.23 | $0.31 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $0.21 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.49 | $0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-12.9M | $57.7M |
| Total Assets | $56.3M | $621.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $57.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.9M | $56.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.2M | $55.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.8M | $54.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-695.9K | $53.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1M | $54.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $52.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.2M | $52.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $621.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.3M | $622.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.3M | $609.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.4M | $619.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.0M | $607.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.9M | $628.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $637.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $70.3M | $643.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-190.6K | $2.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.70× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-190.6K | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.4M | $991.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-819.4K | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.3M | $871.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.2M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.8M | $650.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-951.6K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.7M | $843.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -20.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -14.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -46.1% | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -86.7% | 46.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -92.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.63× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.