vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BranchOut Food Inc. (BOF) and Borealis Foods Inc. (BRLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Borealis Foods Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.1M vs $4.0M, roughly 1.8× BranchOut Food Inc.). BranchOut Food Inc. runs the higher net margin — -50.6% vs -53.2%, a 2.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BranchOut Food Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (181.9% vs -12.0%). Over the past eight quarters, BranchOut Food Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (65.4% CAGR vs -2.4%).
Food Lion is an American regional supermarket chain headquartered in Salisbury, North Carolina, that operates over 1,000 supermarkets in 10 states: Delaware, Georgia, Kentucky, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia. The chain employs over 82,000 people. It was founded in 1957 as Food Town, a single grocery store in Salisbury. It later expanded to many locations across North Carolina. It was independently operated until it was acquired b...
Borealis Foods Inc is a food technology enterprise specializing in developing and producing high-quality plant-based protein products including plant-based meat alternatives. It mainly serves retail and food service customers across North America and Europe, focusing on delivering affordable, nutritious sustainable food options matching the taste of conventional animal-derived meat.
BOF vs BRLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.0M | $7.1M |
| Net Profit | $-2.0M | $-3.8M |
| Gross Margin | 7.6% | 14.6% |
| Operating Margin | -47.6% | -27.1% |
| Net Margin | -50.6% | -53.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 181.9% | -12.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -36.5% | 21.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.15 | $-0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2M | $7.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4M | $6.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5M | $7.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.6M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-918.4K | $-4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.5M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.3M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-942.6K | $-6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.7% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.4% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | 13.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.4% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.9% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.3% | 3.1% |
| Q4 25 | -47.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.3% | -27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -40.8% | -46.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -21.4% | -42.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.7% | -68.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -41.4% | -44.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -60.6% | -94.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -69.9% | -88.3% |
| Q4 25 | -50.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -48.8% | -53.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -48.6% | -64.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -28.8% | -61.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -104.5% | -85.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -58.3% | -59.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -69.2% | -115.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -71.6% | -106.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.14 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.17 | $0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.16 | $-0.82 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.19 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.22 | $0.29 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.26 | $-0.49 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.6M | $-12.9M |
| Total Assets | $14.5M | $56.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.89× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | $-695.9K | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $16.2M |
| Q4 25 | $14.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.7M | $56.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.2M | $57.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.1M | $58.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.9M | $60.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.6M | $61.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7M | $63.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7M | $70.3M |
| Q4 25 | 0.89× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.9M | $-190.6K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -52.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-7.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.1M | $-190.6K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.0M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.9M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.6M | $-819.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.9M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-853.9K | $-4.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-503.6K | $-6.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.3M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.3M | $-951.6K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.4M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.4M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-553.6K | $-7.3M |
| Q4 25 | -52.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -64.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -72.2% | -20.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -163.6% | -14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -157.9% | -46.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -101.3% | -86.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -37.7% | -92.7% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 51.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 70.8% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.6% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | 7.0% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
