vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Borealis Foods Inc. (BRLS) and High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Borealis Foods Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.1M vs $6.3M, roughly 1.1× High Roller Technologies, Inc.). High Roller Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 58.4% vs -53.2%, a 111.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Borealis Foods Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-12.0% vs -16.4%).
Borealis Foods Inc is a food technology enterprise specializing in developing and producing high-quality plant-based protein products including plant-based meat alternatives. It mainly serves retail and food service customers across North America and Europe, focusing on delivering affordable, nutritious sustainable food options matching the taste of conventional animal-derived meat.
S&S – Sansei Technologies is an American company known for its pneumatically powered amusement rides and roller coaster designing.
BRLS vs ROLR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.1M | $6.3M |
| Net Profit | $-3.8M | $3.7M |
| Gross Margin | 14.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -27.1% | 1.3% |
| Net Margin | -53.2% | 58.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -12.0% | -16.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.8% | 831.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $7.1M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $7.5M | — |
| Q3 25 | $-3.8M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.6M | $-592.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.2M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.8M | $-501.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.4M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-6.7M | — |
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 7.5% | — |
| Q3 25 | -27.1% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -46.7% | -7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -42.6% | -47.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -68.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -44.8% | -6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -94.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -88.3% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -60.5% | — |
| Q3 25 | -53.2% | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -64.0% | -8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -61.2% | -48.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -85.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -59.8% | -6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -115.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -106.8% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -89.3% | — |
| Q3 25 | $-0.18 | $0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.21 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.82 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.23 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.49 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-0.63 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $2.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-12.9M | $6.6M |
| Total Assets | $56.3M | $16.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $-12.9M | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.2M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.8M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-695.9K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1M | $-779.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.2M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-21.3M | — |
| Q3 25 | $56.3M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.3M | $12.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.4M | $12.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.9M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $70.3M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $65.8M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-190.6K | $-78.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-90.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-190.6K | $-78.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $-840.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.4M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-819.4K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.8M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-1.9M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-90.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-845.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.4M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-951.6K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.3M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-2.9M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -20.3% | -53.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -14.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -46.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -86.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -92.7% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -38.9% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 12.7% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -0.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BRLS
Segment breakdown not available.
ROLR
| Net Gaming Revenue | $4.9M | 77% |
| Net Revenue Noncore Services | $1.4M | 23% |
