vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. (BRLT) and SONIDA SENIOR LIVING, INC. (SNDA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($124.4M vs $97.7M, roughly 1.3× SONIDA SENIOR LIVING, INC.). Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -2.3% vs -30.5%, a 28.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SONIDA SENIOR LIVING, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.2% vs 4.1%). Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($5.7M vs $-9.3M). Over the past eight quarters, SONIDA SENIOR LIVING, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (20.3% CAGR vs 13.1%).
Brilliant Earth is an American company that sells jewelry featuring diamonds and other gemstones that are asserted to be ethically sourced. The company was established in August 2005 by Beth Gerstein and Eric Grossberg, and is headquartered in San Francisco, California. According to Businessweek, the company has been influential in creating a market for ethically sourced jewelry. Some provenance claims were disputed as per a 2017 The Next Web article.
Sonida Senior Living, Inc. is a leading owner, operator and investor in senior housing communities in the United States in terms of resident capacity. The company and its predecessors have provided senior housing since 1990. As of June 1, 2025, the company operated 96 senior housing communities in 20 states with an aggregate capacity of approximately 10,000+ residents, including 83 senior housing communities that the company owns and 13 communities that the company manages on behalf of third ...
BRLT vs SNDA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $124.4M | $97.7M |
| Net Profit | $-2.9M | $-29.8M |
| Gross Margin | 55.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.0% | -30.8% |
| Net Margin | -2.3% | -30.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.1% | 6.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -908.9% | -441.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.20 | $-1.73 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $124.4M | $97.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $110.3M | $98.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $93.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $93.9M | $91.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $119.5M | $91.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $99.9M | $74.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $105.4M | $70.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $97.3M | $67.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.9M | $-29.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-107.0K | $-26.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-166.0K | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-466.0K | $-12.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $358.0K | $-5.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-141.0K | $-13.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $185.0K | $-9.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $139.0K | $27.0M |
| Q4 25 | 55.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 58.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.0% | -30.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.6% | -27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.1% | -2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.8% | 21.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | -6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.1% | -19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | -13.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 22.1% |
| Q4 25 | -2.3% | -30.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.1% | -27.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.2% | -1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.5% | -13.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | -6.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.1% | -18.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | -14.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 40.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.20 | $-1.73 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.01 | $-1.56 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $-0.77 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $-0.86 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.98 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $-0.86 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $2.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $79.1M | $11.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $0 | $689.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $12.3M | $-11.0K |
| Total Assets | $200.9M | $844.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $79.1M | $11.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.4M | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.6M | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $147.3M | $14.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.9M | $17.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $152.7M | $24.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $152.2M | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $147.5M | $24.2M |
| Q4 25 | $0 | $689.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | $684.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.5M | $677.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $54.5M | $650.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.7M | $651.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.1M | $604.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $583.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $58.8M | $578.1M |
| Q4 25 | $12.3M | $-11.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.0M | $29.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3M | $56.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9M | $58.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.3M | $71.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $77.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.1M | $-34.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.3M | $-41.4M |
| Q4 25 | $200.9M | $844.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $203.0M | $854.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $260.9M | $849.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $269.6M | $824.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $281.2M | $841.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $273.2M | $796.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $272.5M | $652.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $268.2M | $636.3M |
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | 22.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.26× | 11.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.65× | 11.08× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.63× | 9.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.01× | 7.79× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.13× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.43× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $7.2M | $-400.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $5.7M | $-9.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.6% | -9.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 9.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $5.8M | $-8.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $7.2M | $-400.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $608.0K | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.1M | $8.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.1M | $3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.1M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.8M | $-4.1M |
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.0K | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.9M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $674.0K | $-5.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.5M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.4M | $-9.9M |
| Q4 25 | 4.6% | -9.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.3% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.4% | -4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.0% | -11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.1% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.5% | -14.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 9.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 8.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.36× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.51× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -41.65× | -0.15× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BRLT
| US | $120.3M | 97% |
| Non Us | $4.2M | 3% |
SNDA
| Health Care Resident Service | $86.3M | 88% |
| Community Reimbursement Revenue | $10.3M | 11% |
| Management Service | $1.1M | 1% |
