vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Dutch Bros Inc. (BROS) and CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP (CATY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Dutch Bros Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($464.4M vs $222.8M, roughly 2.1× CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP). CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP runs the higher net margin — 653.4% vs 5.1%, a 648.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dutch Bros Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.8% vs 19.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Dutch Bros Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (19.6% CAGR vs 12.8%).

Dutch Bros Inc., originally written Dutch Bros., is a publicly held drive-through coffee chain in the United States. Founded in 1992 by Dane and Travis Boersma, it is headquartered in Tempe, Arizona, after having been based in Grants Pass, Oregon, for many years prior to 2025. It has company-owned and franchise locations primarily located in the Western United States, although the company has expanded as far east as Orlando, Florida.

Cathay General Bancorp is a U.S.-headquartered bank holding company that operates Cathay Bank, offering full-spectrum commercial and personal banking services. It primarily serves Asian American communities and small-to-medium enterprises across major U.S. states including California, New York and Texas, as well as select Asian markets, with products covering deposits, loans, and wealth management solutions.

BROS vs CATY — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
BROS
BROS
2.1× larger
BROS
$464.4M
$222.8M
CATY
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
BROS
BROS
+11.3% gap
BROS
30.8%
19.5%
CATY
Higher net margin
CATY
CATY
648.3% more per $
CATY
653.4%
5.1%
BROS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
BROS
BROS
Annualised
BROS
19.6%
12.8%
CATY

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
BROS
BROS
CATY
CATY
Revenue
$464.4M
$222.8M
Net Profit
$23.7M
$90.5M
Gross Margin
23.1%
Operating Margin
7.4%
50.9%
Net Margin
5.1%
653.4%
Revenue YoY
30.8%
19.5%
Net Profit YoY
5.3%
12.9%
EPS (diluted)
$0.13
$1.33

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BROS
BROS
CATY
CATY
Q1 26
$464.4M
Q4 25
$443.6M
$222.8M
Q3 25
$423.6M
$210.6M
Q2 25
$415.8M
$196.6M
Q1 25
$355.2M
$187.8M
Q4 24
$342.8M
$186.5M
Q3 24
$338.2M
$189.5M
Q2 24
$324.9M
$178.5M
Net Profit
BROS
BROS
CATY
CATY
Q1 26
$23.7M
Q4 25
$21.4M
$90.5M
Q3 25
$17.5M
$77.7M
Q2 25
$25.6M
$77.5M
Q1 25
$15.4M
$69.5M
Q4 24
$3.6M
$80.2M
Q3 24
$12.6M
$67.5M
Q2 24
$11.9M
$66.8M
Gross Margin
BROS
BROS
CATY
CATY
Q1 26
23.1%
Q4 25
24.1%
Q3 25
25.2%
Q2 25
28.9%
Q1 25
25.3%
Q4 24
25.7%
Q3 24
26.6%
Q2 24
27.8%
Operating Margin
BROS
BROS
CATY
CATY
Q1 26
7.4%
Q4 25
7.7%
50.9%
Q3 25
9.8%
44.5%
Q2 25
13.1%
49.0%
Q1 25
8.7%
46.1%
Q4 24
4.6%
46.5%
Q3 24
9.6%
41.2%
Q2 24
9.9%
40.7%
Net Margin
BROS
BROS
CATY
CATY
Q1 26
5.1%
Q4 25
4.8%
653.4%
Q3 25
4.1%
36.9%
Q2 25
6.2%
39.4%
Q1 25
4.3%
37.0%
Q4 24
1.1%
587.9%
Q3 24
3.7%
35.6%
Q2 24
3.7%
37.4%
EPS (diluted)
BROS
BROS
CATY
CATY
Q1 26
$0.13
Q4 25
$0.17
$1.33
Q3 25
$0.14
$1.13
Q2 25
$0.20
$1.10
Q1 25
$0.13
$0.98
Q4 24
$0.03
$1.11
Q3 24
$0.11
$0.94
Q2 24
$0.12
$0.92

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BROS
BROS
CATY
CATY
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$263.5M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$199.3M
$119.1M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$920.5M
$2.9B
Total Assets
$3.1B
$24.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.22×
0.04×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BROS
BROS
CATY
CATY
Q1 26
$263.5M
Q4 25
$269.4M
Q3 25
$267.2M
Q2 25
$254.4M
Q1 25
$316.4M
Q4 24
$293.4M
Q3 24
$281.1M
Q2 24
$260.9M
Total Debt
BROS
BROS
CATY
CATY
Q1 26
$199.3M
Q4 25
$202.5M
$119.1M
Q3 25
$202.3M
$119.1M
Q2 25
$203.3M
$119.1M
Q1 25
$284.2M
$119.1M
Q4 24
$238.0M
$119.1M
Q3 24
$241.2M
$119.1M
Q2 24
$244.3M
$119.1M
Stockholders' Equity
BROS
BROS
CATY
CATY
Q1 26
$920.5M
Q4 25
$680.8M
$2.9B
Q3 25
$656.6M
$2.9B
Q2 25
$636.2M
$2.9B
Q1 25
$599.1M
$2.9B
Q4 24
$537.4M
$2.8B
Q3 24
$523.1M
$2.8B
Q2 24
$509.1M
$2.8B
Total Assets
BROS
BROS
CATY
CATY
Q1 26
$3.1B
Q4 25
$3.0B
$24.2B
Q3 25
$2.9B
$24.1B
Q2 25
$2.8B
$23.7B
Q1 25
$2.8B
$23.2B
Q4 24
$2.5B
$23.1B
Q3 24
$2.4B
$23.3B
Q2 24
$2.4B
$23.2B
Debt / Equity
BROS
BROS
CATY
CATY
Q1 26
0.22×
Q4 25
0.30×
0.04×
Q3 25
0.31×
0.04×
Q2 25
0.32×
0.04×
Q1 25
0.47×
0.04×
Q4 24
0.44×
0.04×
Q3 24
0.46×
0.04×
Q2 24
0.48×
0.04×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BROS
BROS
CATY
CATY
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$84.7M
$368.6M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$363.7M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
163.2%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
3.58×
4.07×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$672.7M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BROS
BROS
CATY
CATY
Q1 26
$84.7M
Q4 25
$79.6M
$368.6M
Q3 25
$89.1M
$150.6M
Q2 25
$89.9M
$64.0M
Q1 25
$36.9M
$99.0M
Q4 24
$62.2M
$329.2M
Q3 24
$83.5M
$81.2M
Q2 24
$59.5M
$72.9M
Free Cash Flow
BROS
BROS
CATY
CATY
Q1 26
Q4 25
$8.5M
$363.7M
Q3 25
$18.9M
$150.1M
Q2 25
$35.7M
$62.7M
Q1 25
$-8.7M
$96.3M
Q4 24
$19.5M
$325.5M
Q3 24
$26.4M
$80.0M
Q2 24
$-4.9M
$72.4M
FCF Margin
BROS
BROS
CATY
CATY
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.9%
163.2%
Q3 25
4.5%
71.3%
Q2 25
8.6%
31.9%
Q1 25
-2.4%
51.2%
Q4 24
5.7%
174.6%
Q3 24
7.8%
42.2%
Q2 24
-1.5%
40.5%
Capex Intensity
BROS
BROS
CATY
CATY
Q1 26
Q4 25
16.0%
2.2%
Q3 25
16.6%
0.2%
Q2 25
13.0%
0.6%
Q1 25
12.8%
1.4%
Q4 24
12.5%
1.9%
Q3 24
16.9%
0.6%
Q2 24
19.8%
0.3%
Cash Conversion
BROS
BROS
CATY
CATY
Q1 26
3.58×
Q4 25
3.73×
4.07×
Q3 25
5.09×
1.94×
Q2 25
3.51×
0.83×
Q1 25
2.40×
1.42×
Q4 24
17.23×
4.10×
Q3 24
6.60×
1.20×
Q2 24
4.99×
1.09×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BROS
BROS

Company-operated shops$429.1M92%
Franchising and other$35.4M8%

CATY
CATY

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons