vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BRT Apartments Corp. (BRT) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BRT Apartments Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($24.3M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.8× Laird Superfood, Inc.). Laird Superfood, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -13.2% vs -17.8%, a 4.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs 1.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 1.9%).
BRT Apartments Corp is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that owns, operates, and develops multi-family residential properties primarily across high-growth markets in the United States. Its core portfolio consists of garden-style and mid-rise apartment communities, serving diverse renter groups while targeting long-term asset value appreciation and stable dividend returns for its shareholders.
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
BRT vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $24.3M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $-4.3M | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | -14.3% | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | -17.8% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.3% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -108.7% | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.23 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $24.3M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.4M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.2M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.1M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.0M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.4M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.9M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.4M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-4.3M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.7M | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.6M | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.4M | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.1M | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.2M | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.3M | $-239.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.2M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | -14.3% | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -13.7% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.2% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.3% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -14.3% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.7% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.6% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.0% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | -17.8% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.1% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.6% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.8% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.6% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -9.0% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.8% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.5% | -10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.23 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.12 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.12 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.17 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $25.1M | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $177.2M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $709.8M | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $25.1M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.1M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.6M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.4M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.9M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.8M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.9M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.3M | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $177.2M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $186.7M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $192.1M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $198.5M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $205.0M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $209.9M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $214.7M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.7M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $709.8M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $714.2M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $699.6M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $703.9M | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.5M | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $717.7M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $694.7M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $699.5M | $17.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $14.1M | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $14.1M | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.1M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.5M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $246.0K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.1M | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0M | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.9M | $642.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $653.0K | $-422.3K |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BRT
| Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | $13.2M | 54% |
| Other | $11.1M | 46% |
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
