vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BIT ORIGIN Ltd (BTOG) and Onfolio Holdings, Inc (ONFO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BIT ORIGIN Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9M vs $2.0M, roughly 1.4× Onfolio Holdings, Inc). Onfolio Holdings, Inc runs the higher net margin — -27.0% vs -244.4%, a 217.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Origin Systems, Inc. was an American video game developer based in Austin, Texas. It was founded on March 3, 1983, by Richard Garriott and his brother Robert. Origin is best known for their groundbreaking work in multiple genres of video games, such as the Ultima and Wing Commander series. The company was purchased by Electronic Arts in 1992.
Onfolio Holdings Inc. acquires, manages and grows a diversified portfolio of small to medium-sized online businesses, including niche content sites, e-commerce stores, and SaaS tools. It operates primarily in North America and Western Europe, focusing on high-margin, sustainable digital assets with stable revenue streams.
BTOG vs ONFO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.9M | $2.0M |
| Net Profit | $-7.1M | $-547.1K |
| Gross Margin | — | 50.0% |
| Operating Margin | -233.8% | -59.1% |
| Net Margin | -244.4% | -27.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -20.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -69.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.99 | $-0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-547.1K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-700.7K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-534.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-806.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-323.8K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-335.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-629.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-477.8K |
| Q4 25 | — | 50.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 64.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 61.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 60.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 53.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 59.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 56.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 63.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | -59.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -16.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -43.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -35.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -28.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -27.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -25.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -17.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -28.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -12.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -36.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -30.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.37 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.18 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $6.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.0M | $2.5M |
| Total Assets | $13.5M | $11.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $529.8K |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.6M | $-397.3K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-397.3K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-430.1K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-145.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-471.6K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $67.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-332.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-431.0K |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BTOG
Segment breakdown not available.
ONFO
| B Two B | $1.6M | 81% |
| B Two C | $243.0K | 12% |
| Other | $138.6K | 7% |
