vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of PEABODY ENERGY CORP (BTU) and CARTERS INC (CRI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

PEABODY ENERGY CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0B vs $757.8M, roughly 1.3× CARTERS INC). CARTERS INC runs the higher net margin — 1.5% vs 1.2%, a 0.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CARTERS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.1% vs -9.0%).

Peabody Energy is an American coal mining company headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri. Its primary business consists of the mining, sale, and distribution of coal, which is purchased for use in electricity generation and steelmaking. Peabody also markets, brokers, and trades coal through offices in China, Australia, and the United States.

Carter's, Inc. is a major American designer and marketer of children's apparel. It was founded in 1865 by William Carter.

BTU vs CRI — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
BTU
BTU
1.3× larger
BTU
$1.0B
$757.8M
CRI
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
CRI
CRI
+8.9% gap
CRI
-0.1%
-9.0%
BTU
Higher net margin
CRI
CRI
0.3% more per $
CRI
1.5%
1.2%
BTU

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
BTU
BTU
CRI
CRI
Revenue
$1.0B
$757.8M
Net Profit
$12.4M
$11.6M
Gross Margin
45.1%
Operating Margin
0.8%
3.8%
Net Margin
1.2%
1.5%
Revenue YoY
-9.0%
-0.1%
Net Profit YoY
-67.2%
-80.1%
EPS (diluted)
$0.11
$0.32

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BTU
BTU
CRI
CRI
Q4 25
$1.0B
Q3 25
$1.0B
$757.8M
Q2 25
$890.1M
$585.3M
Q1 25
$937.0M
$629.8M
Q4 24
$1.1B
Q3 24
$1.1B
Q2 24
$1.0B
Q1 24
$983.6M
Net Profit
BTU
BTU
CRI
CRI
Q4 25
$12.4M
Q3 25
$-70.1M
$11.6M
Q2 25
$-27.6M
$446.0K
Q1 25
$34.4M
$15.5M
Q4 24
$37.8M
Q3 24
$101.3M
Q2 24
$199.4M
Q1 24
$39.6M
Gross Margin
BTU
BTU
CRI
CRI
Q4 25
Q3 25
45.1%
Q2 25
48.1%
Q1 25
46.2%
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Operating Margin
BTU
BTU
CRI
CRI
Q4 25
0.8%
Q3 25
-8.0%
3.8%
Q2 25
-4.3%
0.7%
Q1 25
3.4%
4.1%
Q4 24
3.6%
Q3 24
11.0%
Q2 24
22.4%
Q1 24
5.2%
Net Margin
BTU
BTU
CRI
CRI
Q4 25
1.2%
Q3 25
-6.9%
1.5%
Q2 25
-3.1%
0.1%
Q1 25
3.7%
2.5%
Q4 24
3.4%
Q3 24
9.3%
Q2 24
19.1%
Q1 24
4.0%
EPS (diluted)
BTU
BTU
CRI
CRI
Q4 25
$0.11
Q3 25
$-0.58
$0.32
Q2 25
$-0.23
$0.01
Q1 25
$0.27
$0.43
Q4 24
$0.25
Q3 24
$0.74
Q2 24
$1.42
Q1 24
$0.29

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BTU
BTU
CRI
CRI
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$575.3M
$184.2M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$321.2M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$3.5B
$864.6M
Total Assets
$5.8B
$2.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.09×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BTU
BTU
CRI
CRI
Q4 25
$575.3M
Q3 25
$603.3M
$184.2M
Q2 25
$585.9M
$338.2M
Q1 25
$696.5M
$320.8M
Q4 24
$700.4M
Q3 24
$772.9M
Q2 24
$621.7M
Q1 24
$855.7M
Total Debt
BTU
BTU
CRI
CRI
Q4 25
$321.2M
Q3 25
$321.8M
Q2 25
$329.2M
Q1 25
$331.2M
Q4 24
$332.3M
Q3 24
$323.7M
Q2 24
$323.2M
Q1 24
$323.3M
Stockholders' Equity
BTU
BTU
CRI
CRI
Q4 25
$3.5B
Q3 25
$3.5B
$864.6M
Q2 25
$3.6B
$853.9M
Q1 25
$3.7B
$847.2M
Q4 24
$3.7B
Q3 24
$3.6B
Q2 24
$3.7B
Q1 24
$3.5B
Total Assets
BTU
BTU
CRI
CRI
Q4 25
$5.8B
Q3 25
$5.7B
$2.5B
Q2 25
$5.8B
$2.5B
Q1 25
$5.8B
$2.3B
Q4 24
$6.0B
Q3 24
$5.9B
Q2 24
$5.9B
Q1 24
$5.7B
Debt / Equity
BTU
BTU
CRI
CRI
Q4 25
0.09×
Q3 25
0.09×
Q2 25
0.09×
Q1 25
0.09×
Q4 24
0.09×
Q3 24
0.09×
Q2 24
0.09×
Q1 24
0.09×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BTU
BTU
CRI
CRI
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$68.6M
$-128.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-144.1M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-19.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
5.53×
-11.04×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BTU
BTU
CRI
CRI
Q4 25
$68.6M
Q3 25
$122.0M
$-128.0M
Q2 25
$23.2M
$40.3M
Q1 25
$119.9M
$-48.6M
Q4 24
$119.8M
Q3 24
$359.9M
Q2 24
$7.8M
Q1 24
$119.0M
Free Cash Flow
BTU
BTU
CRI
CRI
Q4 25
Q3 25
$-144.1M
Q2 25
$24.1M
Q1 25
$-59.0M
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
FCF Margin
BTU
BTU
CRI
CRI
Q4 25
Q3 25
-19.0%
Q2 25
4.1%
Q1 25
-9.4%
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Capex Intensity
BTU
BTU
CRI
CRI
Q4 25
Q3 25
2.1%
Q2 25
2.8%
Q1 25
1.6%
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Cash Conversion
BTU
BTU
CRI
CRI
Q4 25
5.53×
Q3 25
-11.04×
Q2 25
90.37×
Q1 25
3.49×
-3.13×
Q4 24
3.17×
Q3 24
3.55×
Q2 24
0.04×
Q1 24
3.01×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BTU
BTU

Seaborne Metallurgical Mining$305.4M30%
Powder River Basin Mining$300.3M29%
Seaborne Thermal Mining$205.6M20%
Other$182.1M18%
Thermal Coal$28.9M3%

CRI
CRI

Sales Channel Directly To Consumer$362.3M48%
Sales Channel Through Intermediary$283.8M37%
Other$110.4M15%
Gift Cards$1.3M0%

Related Comparisons