vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PEABODY ENERGY CORP (BTU) and MAXIMUS, INC. (MMS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MAXIMUS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.3× PEABODY ENERGY CORP). MAXIMUS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 30.2% vs 1.2%, a 29.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MAXIMUS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.8% vs -9.0%). Over the past eight quarters, PEABODY ENERGY CORP's revenue compounded faster (1.9% CAGR vs -0.3%).
Peabody Energy is an American coal mining company headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri. Its primary business consists of the mining, sale, and distribution of coal, which is purchased for use in electricity generation and steelmaking. Peabody also markets, brokers, and trades coal through offices in China, Australia, and the United States.
Maximus Inc. is an American government services company, with operations in countries including the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Maximus provides administration and other services for Medicaid, Medicare, health care reform, welfare-to-work, and student loan servicing, among other government programs. The company is based in Tysons, Virginia, has 39,600 employees and a reported annual revenue of $5.3 billion in fiscal year 2024.
BTU vs MMS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $12.4M | $394.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 26.2% |
| Operating Margin | 0.8% | 11.4% |
| Net Margin | 1.2% | 30.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.0% | -2.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -67.2% | -4.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | $7.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $890.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $937.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $394.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.4M | $93.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-70.1M | $75.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-27.6M | $106.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.4M | $96.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.8M | $41.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.3M | $72.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $199.4M | $89.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 26.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.0% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 11.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.6% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.0% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.4% | 10.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.9% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.1% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | 7.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.1% | 6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.27 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $1.70 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.58 | $1.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.23 | $1.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.27 | $1.69 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.25 | $0.69 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.74 | $1.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.42 | $1.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $575.3M | $157.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $321.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.5B | $1.7B |
| Total Assets | $5.8B | $4.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.09× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $157.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $575.3M | $137.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $603.3M | $222.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $585.9M | $59.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $696.5M | $108.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $700.4M | $72.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $772.9M | $183.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $621.7M | $102.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $321.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $329.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $331.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $332.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $323.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $323.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.8B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.8B | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.9B | $4.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.09× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $68.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $450.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 34.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.53× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $643.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $68.6M | $-244.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.0M | $649.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $-182.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.9M | $42.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $119.8M | $-80.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $359.9M | $163.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.8M | $199.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $450.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-250.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $641.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-198.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $25.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-103.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $131.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $164.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.53× | -2.60× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.72× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.49× | 0.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.17× | -1.94× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.55× | 2.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.04× | 2.22× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BTU
| Seaborne Metallurgical Mining | $305.4M | 30% |
| Powder River Basin Mining | $300.3M | 29% |
| Seaborne Thermal Mining | $205.6M | 20% |
| Other | $182.1M | 18% |
| Thermal Coal | $28.9M | 3% |
MMS
Segment breakdown not available.
