vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of PEABODY ENERGY CORP (BTU) and Symbotic Inc. (SYM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

PEABODY ENERGY CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0B vs $630.0M, roughly 1.6× Symbotic Inc.). Symbotic Inc. runs the higher net margin — 2.1% vs 1.2%, a 0.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Symbotic Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (29.4% vs -9.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Symbotic Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs 1.9%).

Peabody Energy is an American coal mining company headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri. Its primary business consists of the mining, sale, and distribution of coal, which is purchased for use in electricity generation and steelmaking. Peabody also markets, brokers, and trades coal through offices in China, Australia, and the United States.

Symbotic Inc. is an American robotics warehouse automation company based in Wilmington, Massachusetts.

BTU vs SYM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
BTU
BTU
1.6× larger
BTU
$1.0B
$630.0M
SYM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
SYM
SYM
+38.4% gap
SYM
29.4%
-9.0%
BTU
Higher net margin
SYM
SYM
0.9% more per $
SYM
2.1%
1.2%
BTU
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
SYM
SYM
Annualised
SYM
13.2%
1.9%
BTU

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026

Metric
BTU
BTU
SYM
SYM
Revenue
$1.0B
$630.0M
Net Profit
$12.4M
$13.4M
Gross Margin
21.2%
Operating Margin
0.8%
79.9%
Net Margin
1.2%
2.1%
Revenue YoY
-9.0%
29.4%
Net Profit YoY
-67.2%
248.9%
EPS (diluted)
$0.11

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BTU
BTU
SYM
SYM
Q1 26
$630.0M
Q4 25
$1.0B
$630.0M
Q3 25
$1.0B
$618.5M
Q2 25
$890.1M
$592.1M
Q1 25
$937.0M
$549.7M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$486.7M
Q3 24
$1.1B
$503.6M
Q2 24
$1.0B
$491.9M
Net Profit
BTU
BTU
SYM
SYM
Q1 26
$13.4M
Q4 25
$12.4M
$2.6M
Q3 25
$-70.1M
$-3.6M
Q2 25
$-27.6M
$-5.9M
Q1 25
$34.4M
$-3.9M
Q4 24
$37.8M
$-3.5M
Q3 24
$101.3M
$-2.5M
Q2 24
$199.4M
$-2.5M
Gross Margin
BTU
BTU
SYM
SYM
Q1 26
21.2%
Q4 25
21.2%
Q3 25
20.6%
Q2 25
18.2%
Q1 25
19.6%
Q4 24
16.4%
Q3 24
12.7%
Q2 24
13.7%
Operating Margin
BTU
BTU
SYM
SYM
Q1 26
79.9%
Q4 25
0.8%
1.0%
Q3 25
-8.0%
-3.5%
Q2 25
-4.3%
-6.2%
Q1 25
3.4%
-5.8%
Q4 24
3.6%
-5.1%
Q3 24
11.0%
-4.3%
Q2 24
22.4%
-5.1%
Net Margin
BTU
BTU
SYM
SYM
Q1 26
2.1%
Q4 25
1.2%
0.4%
Q3 25
-6.9%
-0.6%
Q2 25
-3.1%
-1.0%
Q1 25
3.7%
-0.7%
Q4 24
3.4%
-0.7%
Q3 24
9.3%
-0.5%
Q2 24
19.1%
-0.5%
EPS (diluted)
BTU
BTU
SYM
SYM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$0.11
$0.02
Q3 25
$-0.58
$-0.04
Q2 25
$-0.23
$-0.05
Q1 25
$0.27
$-0.04
Q4 24
$0.25
$-0.03
Q3 24
$0.74
$-0.03
Q2 24
$1.42
$-0.02

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BTU
BTU
SYM
SYM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$575.3M
$1.8B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$321.2M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$3.5B
$663.8M
Total Assets
$5.8B
$3.0B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.09×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BTU
BTU
SYM
SYM
Q1 26
$1.8B
Q4 25
$575.3M
$1.8B
Q3 25
$603.3M
$1.2B
Q2 25
$585.9M
$777.6M
Q1 25
$696.5M
$954.9M
Q4 24
$700.4M
$903.0M
Q3 24
$772.9M
$727.3M
Q2 24
$621.7M
$870.5M
Total Debt
BTU
BTU
SYM
SYM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$321.2M
Q3 25
$321.8M
Q2 25
$329.2M
Q1 25
$331.2M
Q4 24
$332.3M
Q3 24
$323.7M
Q2 24
$323.2M
Stockholders' Equity
BTU
BTU
SYM
SYM
Q1 26
$663.8M
Q4 25
$3.5B
$663.8M
Q3 25
$3.5B
$221.3M
Q2 25
$3.6B
$210.8M
Q1 25
$3.7B
$205.4M
Q4 24
$3.7B
$196.5M
Q3 24
$3.6B
$197.2M
Q2 24
$3.7B
$418.7M
Total Assets
BTU
BTU
SYM
SYM
Q1 26
$3.0B
Q4 25
$5.8B
$3.0B
Q3 25
$5.7B
$2.4B
Q2 25
$5.8B
$1.8B
Q1 25
$5.8B
$2.0B
Q4 24
$6.0B
$1.7B
Q3 24
$5.9B
$1.6B
Q2 24
$5.9B
$1.6B
Debt / Equity
BTU
BTU
SYM
SYM
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.09×
Q3 25
0.09×
Q2 25
0.09×
Q1 25
0.09×
Q4 24
0.09×
Q3 24
0.09×
Q2 24
0.09×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BTU
BTU
SYM
SYM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$68.6M
$191.5M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$189.5M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
30.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
5.53×
14.34×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BTU
BTU
SYM
SYM
Q1 26
$191.5M
Q4 25
$68.6M
$191.5M
Q3 25
$122.0M
$530.7M
Q2 25
$23.2M
$-138.3M
Q1 25
$119.9M
$269.6M
Q4 24
$119.8M
$205.0M
Q3 24
$359.9M
$-99.4M
Q2 24
$7.8M
$50.4M
Free Cash Flow
BTU
BTU
SYM
SYM
Q1 26
$189.5M
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$197.7M
Q3 24
$-120.1M
Q2 24
$33.5M
FCF Margin
BTU
BTU
SYM
SYM
Q1 26
30.1%
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
40.6%
Q3 24
-23.9%
Q2 24
6.8%
Capex Intensity
BTU
BTU
SYM
SYM
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
1.5%
Q3 24
4.1%
Q2 24
3.4%
Cash Conversion
BTU
BTU
SYM
SYM
Q1 26
14.34×
Q4 25
5.53×
73.61×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
3.49×
Q4 24
3.17×
Q3 24
3.55×
Q2 24
0.04×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BTU
BTU

Seaborne Metallurgical Mining$305.4M30%
Powder River Basin Mining$300.3M29%
Seaborne Thermal Mining$205.6M20%
Other$182.1M18%
Thermal Coal$28.9M3%

SYM
SYM

Systems$590.3M94%
Operation services$28.8M5%
Software maintenance and support$10.9M2%

Related Comparisons