vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Burlington Stores, Inc. (BURL) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Burlington Stores, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.7B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.3× Marvell Technology, Inc.). Marvell Technology, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 91.7% vs 3.9%, a 87.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Marvell Technology, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (36.8% vs 7.1%). Marvell Technology, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($508.8M vs $-109.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Marvell Technology, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (20.6% CAGR vs -6.9%).
Burlington, formerly known as Burlington Coat Factory, is an American national off-price retailer, and a division of Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation with more than 1,138 stores in 46 states and Puerto Rico, with its corporate headquarters located in Burlington Township, New Jersey. In 2007, it was acquired by Bain Capital in a transaction and in 2008, Tom Kingsbury became president and CEO. The company went public again in 2013. Burlington is the third largest off-price retailer...
Marvell Technology, Inc. is an American company, headquartered in Santa Clara, California, which develops and produces semiconductors and related technology. Founded in 1995, the company had more than 6,500 employees as of 2024, with over 10,000 patents worldwide, and an annual revenue of $5.5 billion for fiscal 2024.
BURL vs MRVL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.7B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $104.8M | $1.9B |
| Gross Margin | 44.2% | 51.6% |
| Operating Margin | 5.1% | 17.2% |
| Net Margin | 3.9% | 91.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.1% | 36.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.6% | 381.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.63 | $2.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $104.8M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.2M | $194.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.8M | $177.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $260.8M | $200.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $-676.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.8M | $-193.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.5M | $-215.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $227.5M | $-392.7M |
| Q4 25 | 44.2% | 51.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.7% | 50.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.8% | 50.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.9% | 50.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.9% | 23.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.8% | 46.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.5% | 45.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.7% | 46.6% |
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | 17.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.6% | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | -46.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | -7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | -2.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 91.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.0% | 11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.6% | -44.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | -15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | -18.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.3% | -27.5% |
| Q4 25 | $1.63 | $2.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.47 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.58 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.03 | $0.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.40 | $-0.78 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.15 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.22 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.51 | $-0.45 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $584.1M | $2.7B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.0B | $4.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $14.1B |
| Total Assets | $9.6B | $21.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.32× | 0.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $584.1M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $747.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $371.1M | $885.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $994.7M | $948.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $857.8M | $868.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $659.9M | $808.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $742.3M | $847.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $925.4M | $950.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $4.2B |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $14.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $13.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $13.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $13.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $13.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $14.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $14.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $996.9M | $14.8B |
| Q4 25 | $9.6B | $21.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.3B | $20.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.5B | $20.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.8B | $20.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.4B | $19.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8B | $20.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7B | $20.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.7B | $21.2B |
| Q4 25 | 1.32× | 0.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.40× | 0.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.21× | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.12× | 0.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.35× | 0.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.15× | 0.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.20× | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.40× | 0.28× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $143.3M | $582.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-109.6M | $508.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -4.1% | 24.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 9.3% | 3.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.37× | 0.31× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-358.5M | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $143.3M | $582.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $179.4M | $461.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.9M | $332.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $543.2M | $514.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $110.4M | $536.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $160.4M | $306.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.4M | $324.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $598.5M | $546.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-109.6M | $508.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-101.0K | $414.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-438.6M | $214.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $189.8M | $444.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-56.2M | $461.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-35.2M | $258.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-115.5M | $233.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $410.3M | $475.6M |
| Q4 25 | -4.1% | 24.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.0% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.5% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | 24.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.2% | 30.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.9% | 20.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.1% | 33.3% |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.4% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.8% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.0% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.0% | 5.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.37× | 0.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.91× | 2.37× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.29× | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.08× | 2.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.22× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.63× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
