vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BV Financial, Inc. (BVFL) and High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BV Financial, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($10.5M vs $6.3M, roughly 1.7× High Roller Technologies, Inc.). High Roller Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 58.4% vs 45.6%, a 12.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BV Financial, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.2% vs -16.4%). BV Financial, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($18.8M vs $-90.0K).
Virtu Financial, Inc. is an American high-frequency trading company. The company went public on the Nasdaq in 2015.
S&S – Sansei Technologies is an American company known for its pneumatically powered amusement rides and roller coaster designing.
BVFL vs ROLR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $10.5M | $6.3M |
| Net Profit | $4.8M | $3.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 66.9% | 1.3% |
| Net Margin | 45.6% | 58.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.2% | -16.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 146.2% | 831.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.52 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.2M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.0M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | $-592.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8M | $-501.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 66.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.5% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | -7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.4% | -47.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.4% | -6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 45.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.2% | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.0% | -8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.9% | -48.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.0% | -6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.52 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.41 | $0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.29 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.21 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.35 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.24 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $55.7M | $2.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $35.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $183.8M | $6.6M |
| Total Assets | $912.2M | $16.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.19× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $55.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.5M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.3M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.8M | $3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $94.1M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $78.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $35.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $183.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.2M | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $198.0M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $198.1M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $195.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $209.7M | $-779.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $205.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $201.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $912.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $909.4M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $908.3M | $12.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $921.9M | $12.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $911.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $892.7M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $897.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $892.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.17× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $19.0M | $-78.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $18.8M | $-90.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 178.2% | -1.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.2% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.96× | -0.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $34.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4M | $-78.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7M | $-840.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $18.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4M | $-90.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6M | $-845.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 178.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 84.0% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.1% | -12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.0% | -53.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 160.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.96× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.26× | -0.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.95× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.11× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.23× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.77× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BVFL
Segment breakdown not available.
ROLR
| Net Gaming Revenue | $4.9M | 77% |
| Net Revenue Noncore Services | $1.4M | 23% |
