vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BORGWARNER INC (BWA) and MAGNA INTERNATIONAL INC (MGA), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BorgWarner Inc. is an American automotive and e-mobility supplier headquartered in Auburn Hills, Michigan. As of 2023, the company maintains production facilities and sites at 92 locations in 24 countries, and generates revenues of US$14.2 billion, while employing around 39,900 people. The company is one of the 25 largest automotive suppliers in the world. Since February 2025, Joseph F. Fadool has been CEO of BorgWarner Inc.
Magna International Inc. is a Canadian parts manufacturer for automakers. It is one of the largest companies in Canada and was recognized on the 2020 Forbes Global 2000. The company is the largest automobile parts manufacturer in North America by sales of original equipment parts; it has ranked consistently in the Fortune Global 500 list for 20 years in a row since 2001. It produces automotive systems, assemblies, modules, and components, which are supplied to General Motors, Ford and Stellan...
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | $-262.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $158.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $224.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $157.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-405.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $234.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $303.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $206.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 20.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -6.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -7.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-1.20 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.73 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.03 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.72 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.78 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.04 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.34 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.90 | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
