vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MAGNA INTERNATIONAL INC (MGA) and Rivian Automotive, Inc. / DE (RIVN), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Magna International Inc. is a Canadian parts manufacturer for automakers. It is one of the largest companies in Canada and was recognized on the 2020 Forbes Global 2000. The company is the largest automobile parts manufacturer in North America by sales of original equipment parts; it has ranked consistently in the Fortune Global 500 list for 20 years in a row since 2001. It produces automotive systems, assemblies, modules, and components, which are supplied to General Motors, Ford and Stellan...
Rivian Automotive, Inc., is an American electric vehicle manufacturer and automotive technology company founded in 2009. It produces an electric sport utility vehicle (SUV), a pickup truck on a "skateboard" platform that can support future vehicles or be adopted by other companies, and an electric delivery van, the Rivian EDV. It started deliveries of its R1T pickup truck in late 2021. The company planned to build an exclusive charging network in the United States and Canada by the end of 2023.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $874.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $-811.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-545.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-744.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -44.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -38.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -43.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | -64.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -63.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -85.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -52.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -38.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -133.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -118.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -123.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | -63.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -75.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -85.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -44.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -42.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -125.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -125.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -120.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.66 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.96 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.97 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.48 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.67 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.46 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.48 |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
