vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) and NATURAL ALTERNATIVES INTERNATIONAL INC (NAII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NATURAL ALTERNATIVES INTERNATIONAL INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($34.8M vs $30.3M, roughly 1.1× Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.). On growth, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (43.3% vs 2.1%). Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($27.1M vs $-7.3M). Over the past eight quarters, NATURAL ALTERNATIVES INTERNATIONAL INC's revenue compounded faster (17.7% CAGR vs 17.2%).
Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. is a US-based bank holding company that provides a full suite of personal and commercial banking products and services, including deposit accounts, mortgage loans, commercial lending, and wealth management solutions. It primarily serves local communities, retail customers, and small to medium-sized enterprises across Connecticut.
Natural Alternatives International, Inc. (NAI) is an American company based in Carlsbad, California which manufactures nutritional supplements such as Juice Plus. NAI was founded in 1980 by Mark A. LeDoux, and had 241 employees in 2007. NAI's manufacturing facilities are located in Vista, California, Switzerland and Japan.
BWFG vs NAII — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30.3M | $34.8M |
| Net Profit | — | $-2.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 7.2% |
| Operating Margin | 46.9% | -5.3% |
| Net Margin | — | -7.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 43.3% | 2.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -16.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.16 | $-0.42 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $30.3M | $34.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.5M | $37.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.9M | $33.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.6M | $28.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.2M | $34.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.9M | $33.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.9M | $29.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.1M | $25.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | $-291.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.1M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8M | $-1.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | 46.9% | -5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.5% | -5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.0% | -7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.2% | -8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | -5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.7% | -8.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.0% | -7.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | -7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.4% | -0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.0% | -21.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | -7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.8% | -6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | -6.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.1% | -6.3% |
| Q4 25 | $1.16 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.27 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.15 | $-1.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.87 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.37 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.24 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.14 | $-0.32 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.48 | $-0.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $192.1M | $3.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $301.5M | $67.0M |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $153.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $192.1M | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $128.2M | $7.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $142.6M | $12.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.0M | $10.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $146.1M | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $145.9M | $10.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.0M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $126.2M | $12.4M |
| Q4 25 | $301.5M | $67.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $292.8M | $69.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $283.3M | $68.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $275.2M | $76.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $270.5M | $79.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $267.9M | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $267.0M | $82.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $268.0M | $84.1M |
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | $153.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $156.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $151.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $154.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $156.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $161.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $162.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | $153.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $28.3M | $-6.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.1M | $-7.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 89.5% | -20.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 2.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $47.0M | $-5.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $28.3M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.5M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9M | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.9M | $37.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-557.0K | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.0M | $-3.6M |
| Q4 25 | $27.1M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.9M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8M | $5.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.3M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-672.0K | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.9M | $-3.9M |
| Q4 25 | 89.5% | -20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.9% | -13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.5% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.2% | 18.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 138.6% | -3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.1% | -11.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.0% | -12.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.5% | -15.5% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.29× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.39× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.40× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BWFG
Segment breakdown not available.
NAII
| Private Label Contract Manufacturing | $32.8M | 94% |
| Patent And Trademark Licensing | $2.0M | 6% |
