vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) and Via Transportation, Inc. (VIA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($129.0M vs $109.7M, roughly 1.2× Via Transportation, Inc.). Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 1.5% vs -33.6%, a 35.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.1M vs $-31.8M).
SLR Consulting is a privately owned international sustainability consultancy with offices in Europe, North America, South America, Australasia, and Africa. In 2019, it reported revenues of £150.8 million. Its purpose is ‘Making Sustainability Happen’, which it achieves through its global team of expert advisors and technicians, who partner with clients to tackle some of the world’s most complex sustainability challenges. Its ultimate owner is Solar Holdings Topco Limited.
Via Transportation, Inc. is an American technology company that provides software as a service (SaaS) and operations to improve public transportation networks for cities, transit agencies, schools and universities, healthcare providers, and corporations around the world. Via offers fully managed transit services as well as transportation planning tools, consulting services, operational support, and navigation.
BWMN vs VIA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $129.0M | $109.7M |
| Net Profit | $2.0M | $-36.9M |
| Gross Margin | 55.0% | 39.3% |
| Operating Margin | 3.2% | -17.2% |
| Net Margin | 1.5% | -33.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.9% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -66.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $-1.49 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $129.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $126.0M | $109.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $112.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $113.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $113.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $104.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $94.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.6M | $-36.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $771.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 55.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.1% | 39.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 51.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | -17.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | -33.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | $-1.49 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.34 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.37 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.11 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $11.1M | $378.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $57.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $261.1M | $574.6M |
| Total Assets | $579.7M | $702.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.22× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $11.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.2M | $378.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $57.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $261.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.8M | $574.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $249.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $244.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $246.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $243.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $235.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $167.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $579.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $510.2M | $702.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $538.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $528.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $505.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $497.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $463.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $420.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.16× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.16× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.4M | $-30.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.1M | $-31.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.3% | -29.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.76× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $33.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $9.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.2M | $-30.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | $-31.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.0% | -29.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.76× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.02× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.81× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BWMN
Segment breakdown not available.
VIA
| Government Customer | $103.7M | 95% |
| Commercial Customer | $5.9M | 5% |
