vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) and CALERES INC (CAL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BWX Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($885.8M vs $790.1M, roughly 1.1× CALERES INC). BWX Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.5% vs 0.3%, a 10.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BWX Technologies, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.7% vs 6.6%). BWX Technologies, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($56.8M vs $-12.4M). Over the past eight quarters, BWX Technologies, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (21.1% CAGR vs 6.5%).
BWX Technologies, Inc. is a company headquartered in Lynchburg, Virginia that supplies nuclear components and fuel internationally.
Caleres Inc. is an American footwear company that owns and operates a variety of footwear brands. Its headquarters is located in Clayton, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis. The company was founded in 1878 as Bryan, Brown & Company in St. Louis, though it underwent several name changes. The Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company was the largest manufacturer of shoes in America in the early 20th century, but it went bankrupt in June 1939.
BWXT vs CAL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $885.8M | $790.1M |
| Net Profit | $93.0M | $2.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.8% |
| Operating Margin | 10.4% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | 10.5% | 0.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.7% | 6.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.9% | -94.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.02 | $0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $885.8M | $790.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $866.3M | $658.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $764.0M | $614.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $682.3M | $639.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $746.3M | $740.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $672.0M | $683.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $681.5M | $659.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $604.0M | $697.1M |
| Q4 25 | $93.0M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.1M | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.4M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $75.5M | $4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.0M | $41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.5M | $30.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.0M | $30.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $68.5M | $55.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 41.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.8% | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | 45.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.2% | 43.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.4% | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.7% | 46.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.6% | 43.9% |
| Q4 25 | 10.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.4% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.4% | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.3% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.3% | 8.0% |
| Q4 25 | $1.02 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.89 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.85 | $0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.82 | $0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.77 | $1.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.76 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $0.88 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.75 | $1.56 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $499.8M | $34.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $616.8M |
| Total Assets | $4.3B | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $499.8M | $34.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.6M | $191.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $33.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.4M | $29.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.1M | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.5M | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.3M | $30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.9M | $21.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $616.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $605.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $599.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $598.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $606.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $998.5M | $570.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $946.2M | $560.6M |
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | $1.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $127.0M | $-1.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $56.8M | $-12.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.4% | -1.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.9% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.37× | -0.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $295.3M | $14.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $127.0M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.2M | $47.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.0M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.6M | $28.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.9M | $-39.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.6M | $79.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.9M | $36.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.0M | $43.0M |
| Q4 25 | $56.8M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.9M | $35.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.3M | $-26.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.3M | $18.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $224.4M | $-57.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.7M | $68.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.5M | $26.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | $32.4M |
| Q4 25 | 6.4% | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.1% | -7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.1% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 4.6% |
| Q4 25 | 7.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.0% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1.37× | -0.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.74× | 7.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.03× | -0.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.67× | 5.82× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.90× | -0.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.47× | 2.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.90× | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.48× | 0.77× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BWXT
| Nuclear Component Program | $436.4M | 49% |
| Nuclear Manufacturing | $134.8M | 15% |
| Cost Plus Fee | $116.1M | 13% |
| Uranium And Nuclear Services | $103.8M | 12% |
| Commercial Operations | $49.0M | 6% |
| Commercial Operations Segment | $33.7M | 4% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.3M | 0% |
CAL
| Brand Portfolio | $383.7M | 49% |
| Landed Wholesale | $148.1M | 19% |
| Wholesale E Commerce | $75.0M | 9% |
| Ecommerce | $68.8M | 9% |
| Stuart Weitzman Brand | $45.8M | 6% |
| Landed Wholesale Ecommerce Drop Ship | $30.6M | 4% |
| First Cost Wholesale | $14.9M | 2% |
| Clt Brand Solutions | $10.2M | 1% |
| License And Royalty | $2.1M | 0% |
