vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) and ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD (ESLT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BWX Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($885.8M vs $5.8M, roughly 153.0× ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD). BWX Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.5% vs 6.3%, a 4.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. BWX Technologies, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($56.8M vs $319.6K).
BWX Technologies, Inc. is a company headquartered in Lynchburg, Virginia that supplies nuclear components and fuel internationally.
Elbit Systems Ltd. is an Israel-based international military technology company and defense contractor. Founded in 1966 by Elron, Elbit Systems is the primary provider of the Israeli military's land-based equipment and unmanned aerial vehicles. It is an important company within the defense industry of Israel.
BWXT vs ESLT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $885.8M | $5.8M |
| Net Profit | $93.0M | $367.1K |
| Gross Margin | — | 24.3% |
| Operating Margin | 10.4% | 8.3% |
| Net Margin | 10.5% | 6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.7% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.02 | $7.85 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $885.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $866.3M | $5.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $764.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $682.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $746.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $672.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $681.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $604.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $93.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.1M | $367.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $75.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $68.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.8% | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.1% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.5% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.02 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.89 | $7.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.85 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.82 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.77 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.76 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.75 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $499.8M | $265.4K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $90.7K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $3.3M |
| Total Assets | $4.3B | $11.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.03× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $499.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.6M | $265.4K | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $90.7K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $998.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $946.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $127.0M | $534.6K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $56.8M | $319.6K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.4% | 5.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.9% | 3.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.37× | 1.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $295.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $127.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.2M | $534.6K | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $56.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.9M | $319.6K | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $224.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.74× | 1.46× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.03× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.67× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.90× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.90× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.48× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BWXT
| Nuclear Component Program | $436.4M | 49% |
| Nuclear Manufacturing | $134.8M | 15% |
| Cost Plus Fee | $116.1M | 13% |
| Uranium And Nuclear Services | $103.8M | 12% |
| Commercial Operations | $49.0M | 6% |
| Commercial Operations Segment | $33.7M | 4% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.3M | 0% |
ESLT
Segment breakdown not available.
