vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) and Essex Property Trust (ESS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BWX Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($885.8M vs $479.6M, roughly 1.8× Essex Property Trust). Essex Property Trust runs the higher net margin — 17.9% vs 10.5%, a 7.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BWX Technologies, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.7% vs 5.5%). Over the past eight quarters, BWX Technologies, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (21.1% CAGR vs 6.0%).
BWX Technologies, Inc. is a company headquartered in Lynchburg, Virginia that supplies nuclear components and fuel internationally.
Essex Property Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that invests in apartments in California and in the Seattle metropolitan area.
BWXT vs ESS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $885.8M | $479.6M |
| Net Profit | $93.0M | $85.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 70.0% |
| Operating Margin | 10.4% | 31.7% |
| Net Margin | 10.5% | 17.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.7% | 5.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.9% | -71.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.02 | $1.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $885.8M | $479.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $866.3M | $473.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $764.0M | $469.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $682.3M | $464.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $746.3M | $454.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $672.0M | $450.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $681.5M | $442.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $604.0M | $426.9M |
| Q4 25 | $93.0M | $85.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.1M | $172.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.4M | $231.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $75.5M | $212.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.0M | $301.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.5M | $125.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.0M | $99.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $68.5M | $285.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 70.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.8% | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | 70.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.2% | 69.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 70.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.4% | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.7% | 70.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.6% | 69.7% |
| Q4 25 | 10.4% | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.1% | 44.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 59.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 55.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.4% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 28.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 31.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.4% | 31.0% |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | 17.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.5% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.3% | 49.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.1% | 45.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 66.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.3% | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.3% | 66.8% |
| Q4 25 | $1.02 | $1.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.89 | $2.56 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.85 | $3.44 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.82 | $3.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.77 | $4.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.76 | $1.84 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $1.45 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.75 | $4.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $499.8M | $76.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $5.5B |
| Total Assets | $4.3B | $13.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $499.8M | $76.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.6M | $66.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $58.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.4M | $98.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.1M | $66.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.5M | $71.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.3M | $55.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.9M | $499.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.6B |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $5.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $998.5M | $5.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $946.2M | $5.5B |
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $13.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $13.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $13.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $13.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $12.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $12.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $12.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | $12.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.19× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $127.0M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $56.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.37× | 12.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $295.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $127.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.2M | $342.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.0M | $216.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.6M | $281.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.6M | $316.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.9M | $218.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.0M | $314.9M |
| Q4 25 | $56.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $224.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.37× | 12.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.74× | 1.98× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.03× | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.67× | 1.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.90× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.47× | 2.52× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.90× | 2.21× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.48× | 1.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BWXT
| Nuclear Component Program | $436.4M | 49% |
| Nuclear Manufacturing | $134.8M | 15% |
| Cost Plus Fee | $116.1M | 13% |
| Uranium And Nuclear Services | $103.8M | 12% |
| Commercial Operations | $49.0M | 6% |
| Commercial Operations Segment | $33.7M | 4% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.3M | 0% |
ESS
Segment breakdown not available.