vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) and Gen Digital (GEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gen Digital is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $885.8M, roughly 1.4× BWX Technologies, Inc.). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs 10.5%, a 5.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gen Digital posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.5% vs 18.7%). Over the past eight quarters, BWX Technologies, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (21.1% CAGR vs 13.2%).
BWX Technologies, Inc. is a company headquartered in Lynchburg, Virginia that supplies nuclear components and fuel internationally.
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
BWXT vs GEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $885.8M | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $93.0M | $192.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 78.4% |
| Operating Margin | 10.4% | 34.9% |
| Net Margin | 10.5% | 15.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.7% | 28.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.9% | 6.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.02 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $885.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $866.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $764.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $682.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $746.3M | $986.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $672.0M | $974.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $681.5M | $965.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $192.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $93.0M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.1M | $135.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $75.5M | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.0M | $159.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.5M | $161.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.0M | $181.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 78.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.8% | 78.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.2% | 80.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 80.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.4% | 80.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.7% | 80.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.4% | 35.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.1% | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.4% | 37.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 43.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.5% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.1% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.3% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 18.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.31 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.02 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.89 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.85 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.82 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.77 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.76 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $499.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $8.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $4.3B | $15.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $499.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.1M | $883.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.5M | $737.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.3M | $644.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $998.5M | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $16.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $16.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $15.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $15.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $15.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.61× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.94× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.33× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $127.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $56.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.37× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $295.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.0M | $541.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.2M | $409.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.6M | $473.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.9M | $326.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.6M | $158.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.9M | $264.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $56.8M | $535.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.9M | $405.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.3M | $470.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $224.4M | $318.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.7M | $156.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.5M | $262.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.4% | 43.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.1% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.1% | 16.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 27.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.37× | 4.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.74× | 3.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.03× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.67× | 3.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.90× | 2.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.47× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.90× | 1.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BWXT
| Nuclear Component Program | $436.4M | 49% |
| Nuclear Manufacturing | $134.8M | 15% |
| Cost Plus Fee | $116.1M | 13% |
| Uranium And Nuclear Services | $103.8M | 12% |
| Commercial Operations | $49.0M | 6% |
| Commercial Operations Segment | $33.7M | 4% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.3M | 0% |
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
