vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) and Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. (HHH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BWX Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($885.8M vs $624.4M, roughly 1.4× Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.). BWX Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.5% vs 1.0%, a 9.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BWX Technologies, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.7% vs -33.2%). Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($348.6M vs $56.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (91.0% CAGR vs 21.1%).
BWX Technologies, Inc. is a company headquartered in Lynchburg, Virginia that supplies nuclear components and fuel internationally.
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc., formerly the Howard Hughes Corporation, is a real estate development and management company based in The Woodlands, Texas. It was formed in 2010 as a spin-off from General Growth Properties (GGP). Most of its holdings are focused on several master-planned communities. It took its name from the original Howard Hughes Corporation, which had developed the planned community of Summerlin, Nevada, and later became a subsidiary of GGP.
BWXT vs HHH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $885.8M | $624.4M |
| Net Profit | $93.0M | $6.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.4% | 4.2% |
| Net Margin | 10.5% | 1.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.7% | -33.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.9% | -96.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.02 | $0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $885.8M | $624.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $866.3M | $390.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $764.0M | $260.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $682.3M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $746.3M | $935.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $672.0M | $327.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $681.5M | $317.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $604.0M | $171.1M |
| Q4 25 | $93.0M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.1M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.4M | $-12.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $75.5M | $10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.0M | $156.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.5M | $72.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.0M | $21.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $68.5M | $-52.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.4% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.1% | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 26.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 24.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.4% | 33.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 60.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.4% | -9.8% |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.5% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.3% | -4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.1% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.3% | 22.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.3% | -30.7% |
| Q4 25 | $1.02 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.89 | $2.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.85 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.82 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.77 | $3.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.76 | $1.46 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.75 | $-1.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $499.8M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $3.8B |
| Total Assets | $4.3B | $10.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.35× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $499.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.4M | $493.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.1M | $596.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.5M | $400.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.3M | $436.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.9M | $462.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $998.5M | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $946.2M | $2.9B |
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $10.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $10.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $9.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $9.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | $9.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $127.0M | $360.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $56.8M | $348.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.4% | 55.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.9% | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.37× | 60.04× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $295.3M | $417.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $127.0M | $360.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.2M | $149.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.0M | $177.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.6M | $-224.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.9M | $337.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.6M | $248.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.9M | $-17.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.0M | $-171.2M |
| Q4 25 | $56.8M | $348.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.9M | $137.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.3M | $169.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.3M | $-238.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $224.4M | $317.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.7M | $238.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.5M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | $-182.0M |
| Q4 25 | 6.4% | 55.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | 35.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | 65.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | -119.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.1% | 33.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.1% | 73.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | -7.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | -106.4% |
| Q4 25 | 7.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.0% | 6.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.37× | 60.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.74× | 1.25× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.03× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.67× | -21.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.90× | 2.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.47× | 3.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.90× | -0.83× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.48× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BWXT
| Nuclear Component Program | $436.4M | 49% |
| Nuclear Manufacturing | $134.8M | 15% |
| Cost Plus Fee | $116.1M | 13% |
| Uranium And Nuclear Services | $103.8M | 12% |
| Commercial Operations | $49.0M | 6% |
| Commercial Operations Segment | $33.7M | 4% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.3M | 0% |
HHH
| Transferred At Point In Time | $499.8M | 80% |
| Operating Assets Segment | $117.9M | 19% |
| Builder Price Participation | $12.9M | 2% |
