vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BlueLinx Holdings Inc. (BXC) and EMERSON RADIO CORP (MSN), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BlueLinx Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($748.9M vs $1.9M, roughly 396.0× EMERSON RADIO CORP). BlueLinx Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 0.2% vs -36.7%, a 36.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BlueLinx Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.2% vs -52.8%). Over the past eight quarters, BlueLinx Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (2.5% CAGR vs -7.3%).
BlueLinx Holdings Inc. is a wholesale distributor of building and industrial products in the United States. Headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, Shyam Reddy serves as its President and CEO.
Emerson Radio Corporation is one of the United States' largest volume consumer electronics distributors and has a recognized trademark in continuous use since 1912. The company designs, markets, and licenses many product lines worldwide, including products sold, and sometimes licensed, under the brand name G Clef, an homage to Emerson's logo.
BXC vs MSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2026 vs Q3 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $748.9M | $1.9M |
| Net Profit | $1.7M | $-694.0K |
| Gross Margin | 14.4% | 10.9% |
| Operating Margin | 1.3% | -43.7% |
| Net Margin | 0.2% | -36.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.2% | -52.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -89.7% | -31.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.20 | $-0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $748.9M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $780.1M | $1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $709.2M | $1.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $710.6M | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $747.3M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $768.4M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $726.2M | $2.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-694.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.3M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-527.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.0M | $-881.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.3M | $-962.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5M | $-883.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.4% | -0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.7% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.9% | 12.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.6% | 15.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -43.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | -98.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | -78.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | -137.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | -18.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | -40.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | -55.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.8% | -52.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | -36.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | -85.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | -68.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | -127.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | -32.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -43.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.4% | -40.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.54 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.33 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.67 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.87 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.65 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.00 | $-0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $429.4M | $13.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $598.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $623.0M | $18.6M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $20.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.96× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $429.4M | $13.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $386.8M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $449.0M | $16.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $505.6M | $16.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $526.3M | $16.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $491.4M | $18.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $481.3M | $19.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $598.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $596.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $596.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $575.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $576.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $574.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $574.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $18.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $623.0M | $19.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $621.3M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $636.1M | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $646.4M | $23.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $655.6M | $24.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $652.3M | $25.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $653.2M | $26.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $20.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $20.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $23.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $23.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $26.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $26.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $28.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $29.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.96× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.96× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.89× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.88× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $58.6M | $-228.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $52.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 0.8% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 35.42× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-25.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | $-228.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.6M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.8M | $-514.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.9M | $-391.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.7M | $-293.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.8M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.8M | $-840.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-31.1M | $-2.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-36.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-39.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.5M | $-301.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.8M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.3M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.6M | $-2.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.2% | -7.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | -77.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | -46.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.0% | -102.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.42× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.21× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.09× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.86× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.50× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.78× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BXC
| Specialty Products | $525.5M | 70% |
| Structural Products | $223.4M | 30% |
MSN
Segment breakdown not available.
