vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EMERSON RADIO CORP (MSN) and UNITED NATURAL FOODS INC (UNFI), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNITED NATURAL FOODS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.8B vs $1.9M, roughly 4146.0× EMERSON RADIO CORP). UNITED NATURAL FOODS INC runs the higher net margin — -36.7% vs -0.1%, a 36.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UNITED NATURAL FOODS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.4% vs -52.8%). Over the past eight quarters, UNITED NATURAL FOODS INC's revenue compounded faster (2.3% CAGR vs -7.3%).
Emerson Radio Corporation is one of the United States' largest volume consumer electronics distributors and has a recognized trademark in continuous use since 1912. The company designs, markets, and licenses many product lines worldwide, including products sold, and sometimes licensed, under the brand name G Clef, an homage to Emerson's logo.
United Natural Foods, Inc. (UNFI) is a Providence, Rhode Island–based natural and organic food company. The largest publicly traded wholesale distributor of health and specialty food in the United States and Canada, it is Whole Foods Market's main supplier, with their traffic making up over a third of its revenue in 2018.
MSN vs UNFI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2026 vs Q2 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9M | $7.8B |
| Net Profit | $-694.0K | $-4.0M |
| Gross Margin | 10.9% | 13.4% |
| Operating Margin | -43.7% | 0.2% |
| Net Margin | -36.7% | -0.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -52.8% | -0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -31.7% | 81.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.9M | $7.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7M | $8.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8M | $8.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0M | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $7.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-694.0K | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.0M | $-87.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.4M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-527.0K | $-21.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-881.0K | $-37.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-962.0K | $-21.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-883.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.1% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.0% | 13.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.3% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.9% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.8% | 13.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -43.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -98.4% | -1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -78.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -137.8% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -18.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -40.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -55.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -52.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -36.7% | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -85.8% | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -68.1% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -127.9% | -0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -13.2% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -32.2% | -0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -43.8% | -0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -40.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.03 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.05 | $-1.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.10 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.03 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.63 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.04 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.3M | $38.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $18.6M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $20.1M | $7.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.5M | $44.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.5M | $52.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.1M | $44.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.4M | $37.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.9M | $39.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $18.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.3M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.5M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.3M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $20.1M | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.7M | $7.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.3M | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.5M | $7.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.4M | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.6M | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.5M | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.20× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.38× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-228.0K | $-38.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-54.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -0.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 0.0% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $344.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $-228.0K | $-38.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.0M | $160.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-514.0K | $173.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-391.0K | $247.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-293.0K | $-110.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | $199.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-840.0K | $125.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-54.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $86.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $119.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $193.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-301.0K | $-159.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | $71.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.0M | $49.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.5% | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -77.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -46.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -102.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.2% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MSN
Segment breakdown not available.
UNFI
| Natural Segment | $4.3B | 55% |
| Conventional Segment | $3.1B | 40% |
| Retail Segment | $560.0M | 7% |
