vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BXP, Inc. (BXP) and SM Energy Co (SM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BXP, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($872.1M vs $704.9M, roughly 1.2× SM Energy Co). On growth, BXP, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.8% vs -17.3%). Over the past eight quarters, SM Energy Co's revenue compounded faster (12.2% CAGR vs 1.3%).
BXP Inc., operating as Boston Properties, is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust focused on owning, managing and developing high-quality Class A commercial office properties across major U.S. metro markets, serving diverse corporate, tech and professional service tenants.
SM Energy Company is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Denver, Colorado.
BXP vs SM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $872.1M | $704.9M |
| Net Profit | $133.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 25.9% |
| Net Margin | 15.3% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 0.8% | -17.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 53.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.69 | $0.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $872.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $877.1M | $704.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $871.5M | $811.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $868.5M | $792.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $865.2M | $844.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $858.6M | $852.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $859.2M | $643.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $850.5M | $634.6M |
| Q1 26 | $133.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $248.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-121.7M | $155.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $89.0M | $201.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.2M | $182.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-228.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.6M | $240.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6M | $210.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 58.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 59.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 51.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 44.0% |
| Q1 26 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -14.0% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.1% | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -26.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 33.1% |
| Q1 26 | $1.69 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.56 | $0.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.77 | $1.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.56 | $1.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.39 | $1.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.46 | $1.63 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.53 | $2.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.51 | $1.82 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $512.8M | $368.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.7B | $4.8B |
| Total Assets | $25.1B | $9.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $512.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $368.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $861.1M | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $447.0M | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $398.1M | $54.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $685.4M | $487.9M |
| Q1 26 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.8B | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | $25.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $26.2B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.0B | $9.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.6B | $9.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.1B | $8.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.5B | $6.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $451.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $407.8M | $451.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.2M | $505.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $353.1M | $571.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $210.0M | $483.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $383.7M | $578.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $286.1M | $452.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $367.1M | $476.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $362.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $231.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $281.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $152.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $312.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $234.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.97× | 2.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.43× | 2.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.42× | 1.88× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.61× | 2.27× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BXP
| Lease | $818.2M | 94% |
| Parking and other | $30.8M | 4% |
| Development and management services | $9.2M | 1% |
SM
Segment breakdown not available.
