vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BXP, Inc. (BXP) and Take-Two Interactive (TTWO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Take-Two Interactive is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $872.1M, roughly 1.9× BXP, Inc.). BXP, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 15.3% vs -5.5%, a 20.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Take-Two Interactive posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.9% vs 0.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Take-Two Interactive's revenue compounded faster (10.2% CAGR vs 1.3%).
BXP Inc., operating as Boston Properties, is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust focused on owning, managing and developing high-quality Class A commercial office properties across major U.S. metro markets, serving diverse corporate, tech and professional service tenants.
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. is an American video game holding company based in New York City founded by Ryan Brant in September 1993.
BXP vs TTWO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $872.1M | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | $133.0M | $-92.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | -2.3% |
| Net Margin | 15.3% | -5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.8% | 24.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 53.0% | 25.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.69 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $872.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $877.1M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $871.5M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $868.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $865.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $858.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $859.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $850.5M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $133.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $248.4M | $-92.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-121.7M | $-133.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $89.0M | $-11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.2M | $-3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-228.9M | $-125.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.6M | $-365.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6M | $-262.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 58.8% | 55.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 59.3% | 55.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.2% | 62.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.2% | 50.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.7% | 55.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.5% | 53.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.8% | 57.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -238.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -13.8% |
| Q1 26 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.3% | -5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -14.0% | -7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.1% | -235.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -26.7% | -9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | -27.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | -19.6% |
| Q1 26 | $1.69 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.56 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.77 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.56 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.39 | $-21.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.46 | $-0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.53 | $-2.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.51 | $-1.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $512.8M | $2.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.7B | $3.5B |
| Total Assets | $25.1B | $10.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $512.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $861.1M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $447.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $398.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $879.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $685.4M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.8B | $6.0B |
| Q1 26 | $25.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $26.2B | $10.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.0B | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.6B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4B | $9.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.1B | $12.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4B | $13.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.5B | $12.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $305.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $236.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 13.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $487.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $407.8M | $305.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.2M | $128.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $353.1M | $-44.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $210.0M | $279.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $383.7M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $286.1M | $-128.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $367.1M | $-191.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $362.7M | $236.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $231.6M | $96.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $281.5M | $-69.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $152.6M | $224.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $312.5M | $-48.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $234.5M | $-165.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.4M | $-226.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.6% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.4% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.6% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.4% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.3% | -12.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.1% | -16.9% |
| Q1 26 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.6% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 2.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.97× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.43× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.42× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.61× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BXP
| Lease | $818.2M | 94% |
| Parking and other | $30.8M | 4% |
| Development and management services | $9.2M | 1% |
TTWO
Segment breakdown not available.
