vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BYLINE BANCORP, INC. (BY) and Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BYLINE BANCORP, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($112.4M vs $72.0M, roughly 1.6× Globalstar, Inc.). BYLINE BANCORP, INC. runs the higher net margin — 33.4% vs -16.1%, a 49.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Globalstar, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.6% vs 9.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Globalstar, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.9% CAGR vs 6.4%).
Byline Bank is a bank headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, United States. It is the primary subsidiary of Byline Bancorp, Inc., a bank holding company, and the 4th largest SBA 7(a) lender.
Globalstar, Inc. is an American telecommunications company that operates a satellite constellation in low Earth orbit (LEO) for satellite phone, low-speed data transmission and Earth observation. The Globalstar second-generation constellation consists of 25 satellites.
BY vs GSAT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $112.4M | $72.0M |
| Net Profit | $37.6M | $-11.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -0.5% |
| Net Margin | 33.4% | -16.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.0% | 17.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 33.0% | 76.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.83 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $112.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $117.0M | $72.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.7M | $73.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $110.5M | $67.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.1M | $60.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $104.7M | $61.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.8M | $72.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.4M | $60.4M |
| Q1 26 | $37.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.5M | $-11.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.2M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.1M | $19.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.2M | $-17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.3M | $-50.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.3M | $9.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.7M | $-9.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.1% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.1% | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.2% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.4% | -14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | -6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.3% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.4% | -2.4% |
| Q1 26 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | -16.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.2% | 28.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.4% | -28.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | -82.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.8% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.9% | -16.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.83 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.77 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.82 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.66 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.64 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.68 | $-0.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.69 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.68 | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $198.4M | $447.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $483.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | $355.7M |
| Total Assets | $9.9B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.36× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $198.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $149.1M | $447.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | $346.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $218.3M | $308.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $421.3M | $241.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $563.1M | $391.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.6M | $51.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $730.5M | $64.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $483.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $508.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $491.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $502.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $511.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $394.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $393.1M |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $355.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $364.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $360.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $344.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $358.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $394.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $383.0M |
| Q1 26 | $9.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4B | $917.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6B | $926.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.03× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $175.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.3M | $175.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.3M | $236.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.3M | $157.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.1M | $51.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $175.2M | $340.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.8M | $32.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.1M | $36.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $136.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $171.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 116.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 163.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.06× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.03× | 216.53× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.54× | 8.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.96× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.78× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.65× | 3.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.35× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BY
Segment breakdown not available.
GSAT
| Services | $67.4M | 94% |
| Products | $4.6M | 6% |
