vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. (EVLV) and Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Globalstar, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($72.0M vs $38.5M, roughly 1.9× Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc.). Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 28.3% vs -16.1%, a 44.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.3% vs 17.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (31.8% CAGR vs 12.9%).
Sentient Technologies was an American artificial intelligence technology company based in San Francisco. Sentient was founded in 2007 and received over $143 million in funding at different points after its inception. As of 2016, Sentient was the world's most well-funded AI company. It focused on e-commerce, online content and trading.
Globalstar, Inc. is an American telecommunications company that operates a satellite constellation in low Earth orbit (LEO) for satellite phone, low-speed data transmission and Earth observation. The Globalstar second-generation constellation consists of 25 satellites.
EVLV vs GSAT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $38.5M | $72.0M |
| Net Profit | $10.9M | $-11.6M |
| Gross Margin | 48.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -20.7% | -0.5% |
| Net Margin | 28.3% | -16.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.3% | 17.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 169.2% | 76.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $38.5M | $72.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.9M | $73.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.5M | $67.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.0M | $60.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.1M | $61.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.4M | $72.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.2M | $60.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.2M | $56.5M |
| Q4 25 | $10.9M | $-11.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.8M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-40.5M | $19.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | $-17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-15.7M | $-50.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-30.4M | $9.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $-9.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.3M | $-13.2M |
| Q4 25 | 48.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 57.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 57.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -20.7% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.1% | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -53.8% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -45.0% | -14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -64.9% | -6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -70.0% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -88.7% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -98.8% | -8.3% |
| Q4 25 | 28.3% | -16.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -124.6% | 28.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.3% | -28.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -54.0% | -82.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -111.3% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.6% | -16.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -50.8% | -23.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.25 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.19 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.02 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $49.1M | $447.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $28.6M | $483.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.4M | $355.7M |
| Total Assets | $304.4M | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.24× | 1.36× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $49.1M | $447.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.2M | $346.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.9M | $308.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.0M | $241.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.9M | $391.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $56.0M | $51.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.5M | $64.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.0M | $59.3M |
| Q4 25 | $28.6M | $483.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.5M | $508.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $491.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $502.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | $511.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $394.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $393.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $398.7M |
| Q4 25 | $119.4M | $355.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.2M | $364.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.7M | $360.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $121.1M | $344.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $117.7M | $358.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.0M | $394.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $151.2M | $383.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $139.8M | $377.1M |
| Q4 25 | $304.4M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $304.3M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $280.4M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $256.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $268.1M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $278.5M | $917.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $269.1M | $926.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $280.0M | $917.0M |
| Q4 25 | 0.24× | 1.36× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.28× | 1.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | 1.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.06× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.6M | $175.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.43× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.6M | $175.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5M | $236.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $157.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | $51.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $340.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7M | $32.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.6M | $36.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-16.2M | $29.8M |
| Q4 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 216.53× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.31× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EVLV
Segment breakdown not available.
GSAT
| Services | $67.4M | 94% |
| Products | $4.6M | 6% |
