vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of BYLINE BANCORP, INC. (BY) and El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. (LOCO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($126.2M vs $112.4M, roughly 1.1× BYLINE BANCORP, INC.). BYLINE BANCORP, INC. runs the higher net margin — 33.4% vs 6.5%, a 27.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BYLINE BANCORP, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.0% vs 5.9%). Over the past eight quarters, BYLINE BANCORP, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (6.4% CAGR vs 1.6%).

Byline Bank is a bank headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, United States. It is the primary subsidiary of Byline Bancorp, Inc., a bank holding company, and the 4th largest SBA 7(a) lender.

El Pollo Loco, Inc., is a restaurant chain based in the United States, specializing in Mexican-style grilled chicken. Restaurant service consists of dine-in and take-out, with some locations offering drive-through options. The company is headquartered in Costa Mesa, California, and operates about 500 company-owned and franchised restaurants in the Southwestern United States.

BY vs LOCO — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
LOCO
LOCO
1.1× larger
LOCO
$126.2M
$112.4M
BY
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
BY
BY
+3.2% gap
BY
9.0%
5.9%
LOCO
Higher net margin
BY
BY
27.0% more per $
BY
33.4%
6.5%
LOCO
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
BY
BY
Annualised
BY
6.4%
1.6%
LOCO

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
BY
BY
LOCO
LOCO
Revenue
$112.4M
$126.2M
Net Profit
$37.6M
$8.2M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
9.7%
Net Margin
33.4%
6.5%
Revenue YoY
9.0%
5.9%
Net Profit YoY
33.0%
48.8%
EPS (diluted)
$0.83
$0.27

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BY
BY
LOCO
LOCO
Q1 26
$112.4M
$126.2M
Q4 25
$117.0M
$123.5M
Q3 25
$115.7M
$121.5M
Q2 25
$110.5M
$125.8M
Q1 25
$103.1M
$119.2M
Q4 24
$104.7M
$114.3M
Q3 24
$101.8M
$120.4M
Q2 24
$99.4M
$122.2M
Net Profit
BY
BY
LOCO
LOCO
Q1 26
$37.6M
$8.2M
Q4 25
$34.5M
$6.5M
Q3 25
$37.2M
$7.4M
Q2 25
$30.1M
$7.1M
Q1 25
$28.2M
$5.5M
Q4 24
$30.3M
$6.0M
Q3 24
$30.3M
$6.2M
Q2 24
$29.7M
$7.6M
Operating Margin
BY
BY
LOCO
LOCO
Q1 26
9.7%
Q4 25
40.1%
8.3%
Q3 25
43.1%
9.4%
Q2 25
35.2%
9.0%
Q1 25
36.4%
7.5%
Q4 24
38.6%
7.9%
Q3 24
39.3%
8.4%
Q2 24
40.4%
10.1%
Net Margin
BY
BY
LOCO
LOCO
Q1 26
33.4%
6.5%
Q4 25
34.1%
5.3%
Q3 25
32.1%
6.1%
Q2 25
27.2%
5.6%
Q1 25
27.4%
4.6%
Q4 24
34.3%
5.2%
Q3 24
29.8%
5.1%
Q2 24
29.9%
6.2%
EPS (diluted)
BY
BY
LOCO
LOCO
Q1 26
$0.83
$0.27
Q4 25
$0.77
$0.22
Q3 25
$0.82
$0.25
Q2 25
$0.66
$0.24
Q1 25
$0.64
$0.19
Q4 24
$0.68
$0.21
Q3 24
$0.69
$0.21
Q2 24
$0.68
$0.25

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BY
BY
LOCO
LOCO
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$198.4M
$3.9M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.3B
$302.5M
Total Assets
$9.9B
$609.1M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BY
BY
LOCO
LOCO
Q1 26
$198.4M
$3.9M
Q4 25
$149.1M
$6.2M
Q3 25
$259.0M
$10.9M
Q2 25
$218.3M
$9.0M
Q1 25
$421.3M
$4.3M
Q4 24
$563.1M
$2.5M
Q3 24
$452.6M
$7.9M
Q2 24
$730.5M
$10.5M
Total Debt
BY
BY
LOCO
LOCO
Q1 26
Q4 25
$51.0M
Q3 25
$61.0M
Q2 25
$69.0M
Q1 25
$73.0M
Q4 24
$71.0M
Q3 24
$76.0M
Q2 24
$87.0M
Stockholders' Equity
BY
BY
LOCO
LOCO
Q1 26
$1.3B
$302.5M
Q4 25
$1.3B
$291.1M
Q3 25
$1.2B
$282.9M
Q2 25
$1.2B
$274.2M
Q1 25
$1.1B
$265.7M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$260.7M
Q3 24
$1.1B
$255.2M
Q2 24
$1.0B
$248.6M
Total Assets
BY
BY
LOCO
LOCO
Q1 26
$9.9B
$609.1M
Q4 25
$9.7B
$606.6M
Q3 25
$9.8B
$602.7M
Q2 25
$9.7B
$596.8M
Q1 25
$9.6B
$590.5M
Q4 24
$9.5B
$592.0M
Q3 24
$9.4B
$590.0M
Q2 24
$9.6B
$593.8M
Debt / Equity
BY
BY
LOCO
LOCO
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.18×
Q3 25
0.22×
Q2 25
0.25×
Q1 25
0.27×
Q4 24
0.27×
Q3 24
0.30×
Q2 24
0.35×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons