vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BYLINE BANCORP, INC. (BY) and Opera Ltd (OPRA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Opera Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($142.7M vs $112.4M, roughly 1.3× BYLINE BANCORP, INC.). BYLINE BANCORP, INC. runs the higher net margin — 33.4% vs 12.8%, a 20.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Byline Bank is a bank headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, United States. It is the primary subsidiary of Byline Bancorp, Inc., a bank holding company, and the 4th largest SBA 7(a) lender.
Opera is a multinational technology corporation headquartered in Oslo, Norway, with additional offices in Europe, China, and Africa. Opera offers a range of products and services that include PC and mobile web browsers, GameMaker and gaming portals, the Opera News content recommendation products, the Opera Ads platform, and a number of Web3 and e-commerce products and services. The company's total user base is 296 million monthly active users.
BY vs OPRA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $112.4M | $142.7M |
| Net Profit | $37.6M | $18.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 14.8% |
| Net Margin | 33.4% | 12.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.0% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 33.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.83 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $112.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $117.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $110.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.1M | $142.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $104.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.4M | $211.6M |
| Q1 26 | $37.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.2M | $18.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.7M | $34.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.4% | 14.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.4% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.4% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.9% | 16.1% |
| Q1 26 | $0.83 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.77 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.82 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.66 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.64 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.68 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.69 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.68 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $198.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | — |
| Total Assets | $9.9B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $198.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $149.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $218.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $421.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $563.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $730.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $9.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6B | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
