vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BYLINE BANCORP, INC. (BY) and SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC. (SWBI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($124.7M vs $112.4M, roughly 1.1× BYLINE BANCORP, INC.). BYLINE BANCORP, INC. runs the higher net margin — 33.4% vs 1.5%, a 31.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BYLINE BANCORP, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.0% vs -3.9%). Over the past eight quarters, BYLINE BANCORP, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (6.4% CAGR vs -4.8%).
Byline Bank is a bank headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, United States. It is the primary subsidiary of Byline Bancorp, Inc., a bank holding company, and the 4th largest SBA 7(a) lender.
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (S&W) is an American firearm manufacturer headquartered in Maryville, Tennessee, United States.
BY vs SWBI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $112.4M | $124.7M |
| Net Profit | $37.6M | $1.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 24.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 3.3% |
| Net Margin | 33.4% | 1.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.0% | -3.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 33.0% | -53.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.83 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $112.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $117.0M | $124.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.7M | $85.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $110.5M | $140.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.1M | $115.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $104.7M | $129.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.8M | $88.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.4M | $159.1M |
| Q1 26 | $37.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.5M | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.2M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.1M | $8.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.2M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.3M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.3M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.7M | $27.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 28.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.1% | -3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.2% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.4% | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.3% | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.4% | 17.4% |
| Q1 26 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.1% | -4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.2% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.8% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.9% | 17.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.83 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.77 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.82 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.66 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.64 | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.68 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.69 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.68 | $0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $198.4M | $22.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | $363.2M |
| Total Assets | $9.9B | $548.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $198.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $149.1M | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | $18.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $218.3M | $25.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $421.3M | $26.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $563.1M | $39.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.6M | $35.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $730.5M | $60.8M |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $363.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $364.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $372.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $366.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $371.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $380.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $399.9M |
| Q1 26 | $9.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.7B | $548.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $554.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | $559.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | $578.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.5B | $587.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4B | $571.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6B | $577.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $27.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $16.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 13.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 8.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 14.22× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $21.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.3M | $27.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.3M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.3M | $40.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.1M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $175.2M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.8M | $-30.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.1M | $43.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $136.3M | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.0M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.0M | $-16.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $171.2M | $-10.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.1M | $-35.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.4M | $38.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 116.5% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.8% | -14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.7% | 23.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.3% | -13.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 163.5% | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.8% | -40.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.7% | 24.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 3.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.06× | 14.22× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.54× | 4.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.96× | -4.68× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.78× | -1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.35× | 1.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
