vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BOYD GAMING CORP (BYD) and Take-Two Interactive (TTWO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Take-Two Interactive is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $997.4M, roughly 1.7× BOYD GAMING CORP). BOYD GAMING CORP runs the higher net margin — 10.5% vs -5.5%, a 15.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Take-Two Interactive posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.9% vs 0.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Take-Two Interactive's revenue compounded faster (10.2% CAGR vs 1.5%).
Boyd Gaming Corporation is an American gambling and hospitality company based in Paradise, Nevada, US.
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. is an American video game holding company based in New York City founded by Ryan Brant in September 1993.
BYD vs TTWO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $997.4M | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | $104.3M | $-92.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | 16.4% | -2.3% |
| Net Margin | 10.5% | -5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.6% | 24.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -5.9% | 25.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.37 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $997.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $991.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $961.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $104.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.4M | $-92.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $-133.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $151.5M | $-11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.4M | $-3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $170.5M | $-125.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $131.1M | $-365.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $139.8M | $-262.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 55.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 55.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 62.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 55.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 53.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 57.6% |
| Q1 26 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.7% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.9% | -5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.2% | -238.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.1% | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.9% | -22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.5% | -13.8% |
| Q1 26 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | -5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 143.4% | -7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.2% | -235.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | -9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | -27.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | -19.6% |
| Q1 26 | $1.37 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.60 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.81 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.84 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.31 | $-21.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.89 | $-0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.43 | $-2.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.47 | $-1.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $2.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $3.5B |
| Total Assets | — | $10.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $353.4M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $319.1M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $320.1M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $311.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $316.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $286.3M | $879.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $280.8M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $6.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.6B | $10.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5B | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.6B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.5B | $9.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.4B | $12.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3B | $13.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3B | $12.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.56× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.61× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.88× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.73× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $305.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $236.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 13.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $487.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $275.3M | $305.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $240.0M | $128.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $205.0M | $-44.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $256.4M | $279.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $262.1M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.2M | $-128.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $213.1M | $-191.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.0M | $236.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.4M | $96.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.6M | $-69.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.5M | $224.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.9M | $-48.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $146.0M | $-165.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.7M | $-226.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.0% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | -12.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.2% | -16.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.0% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.8% | 2.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.96× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.76× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.52× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BYD
| Gaming | $650.5M | 65% |
| Online reimbursements | $135.4M | 14% |
| Food & beverage | $75.8M | 8% |
| Other | $63.5M | 6% |
| Room | $45.9M | 5% |
| Management fee | $26.2M | 3% |
TTWO
Segment breakdown not available.