vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Broadway Financial Corp (BYFC) and DNA X, Inc. (SONM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DNA X, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($16.2M vs $9.4M, roughly 1.7× Broadway Financial Corp). Broadway Financial Corp runs the higher net margin — 1934.0% vs -29.3%, a 1963.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Broadway Financial Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.1% vs 7.9%). Over the past eight quarters, DNA X, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (9.9% CAGR vs 9.7%).
Virtu Financial, Inc. is an American high-frequency trading company. The company went public on the Nasdaq in 2015.
BYFC vs SONM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.4M | $16.2M |
| Net Profit | $1.0M | $-4.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 11.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | -24.5% |
| Net Margin | 1934.0% | -29.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.1% | 7.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.8% | -89.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $-4.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1M | $11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3M | $16.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.6M | $15.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2M | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.8M | $9.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.9M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $752.0K | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.7M | $458.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3M | $-21.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $516.0K | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $256.0K | $-6.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-154.0K | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -256.2% | -24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.8% | -60.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -45.3% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.7% | 55.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.5% | -15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.8% | -56.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.9% | -29.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1934.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -264.2% | -29.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | -66.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -32.3% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.3% | -141.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | -16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | -57.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.0% | -31.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.86 | $-4.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.00 | $-0.79 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.39 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $-116.99 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.03 | $-9.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.02 | $-1.41 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.02 | $-0.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.5M | $2.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $262.8M | $-701.0K |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $40.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.7M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.5M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.8M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.4M | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.1M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.8M | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $67.1M | $9.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $262.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.7M | $-701.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $284.7M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $283.6M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $285.0M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $286.2M | $15.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $282.1M | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $281.1M | $19.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $40.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $36.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $36.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $39.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $45.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $42.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $230.0K | $-7.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-13.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.22× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $230.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.3M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1M | $-417.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.8M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.7M | $-168.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-13.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1M | $-554.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.7M | $-198.0K |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -52.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | -29.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 69.6% | -3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 118.9% | -29.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -149.7% | -2.2% |
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -20.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.85× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.21× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
