vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Blaize Holdings, Inc. (BZAI) and i-80 Gold Corp. (IAUX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Blaize Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.8M vs $21.3M, roughly 1.1× i-80 Gold Corp.). Blaize Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -13.9% vs -401.9%, a 388.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. Blaize Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-16.5M vs $-39.2M).
Blaize Holdings, Inc. is a technology company specializing in edge artificial intelligence computing solutions. It designs energy-efficient AI processors, low-latency inference software stacks, and end-to-end edge AI development tools, serving key segments including autonomous driving, industrial automation, smart cities, and edge healthcare monitoring.
i-80 Gold Corp is a mineral exploration and development firm focused on gold and silver asset operations in Nevada, US. It advances high-potential mining projects, using responsible extraction practices to deliver precious metals to global industrial and investment markets.
BZAI vs IAUX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.8M | $21.3M |
| Net Profit | $-3.3M | $-85.6M |
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | 22.0% |
| Operating Margin | -89.8% | -291.6% |
| Net Margin | -13.9% | -401.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 2377500.0% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 50.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.16 | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $23.8M | $21.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9M | $32.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $27.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.3M | $-85.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-26.3M | $-41.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-30.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-41.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-43.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-41.0M |
| Q4 25 | 10.8% | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.0% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -42.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -171.4% |
| Q4 25 | -89.8% | -291.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -190.3% | -86.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -67.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -112.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -210.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -435.2% |
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | -401.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -221.3% | -130.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -108.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -293.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -374.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -570.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.16 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.25 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $45.8M | $63.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $174.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $39.0M | $346.8M |
| Total Assets | $102.2M | $703.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.50× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.8M | $63.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $102.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $133.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $21.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $47.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $174.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $175.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $175.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $197.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $39.0M | $346.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | $423.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $463.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $318.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $346.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $377.2M |
| Q4 25 | $102.2M | $703.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.9M | $756.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $782.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $659.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-16.5M | $-34.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-16.5M | $-39.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -69.6% | -184.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | 23.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-93.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-16.5M | $-34.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-24.9M | $-15.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-11.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-22.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-23.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-24.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-16.5M | $-39.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-24.9M | $-18.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-12.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-23.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-25.1M |
| Q4 25 | -69.6% | -184.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -210.2% | -57.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -164.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -206.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -349.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.3% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BZAI
Segment breakdown not available.
IAUX
| Granite Creek Mining Company | $20.3M | 95% |
| Ruby Hill Mining Company LLC | $991.0K | 5% |
| Lone Tree Minning Company | $3.0K | 0% |
