vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Blaize Holdings, Inc. (BZAI) and IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. (ITP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.6M vs $23.8M, roughly 1.1× Blaize Holdings, Inc.). IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. runs the higher net margin — -5.7% vs -13.9%, a 8.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Blaize Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2377500.0% vs 2.1%). IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.5M vs $-16.5M).
Blaize Holdings, Inc. is a technology company specializing in edge artificial intelligence computing solutions. It designs energy-efficient AI processors, low-latency inference software stacks, and end-to-end edge AI development tools, serving key segments including autonomous driving, industrial automation, smart cities, and edge healthcare monitoring.
IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. is a paper manufacturing enterprise primarily operating in China. It produces and distributes a diverse portfolio of paper products including corrugated packaging paper, boxboard, and printing-use cultural paper, serving sectors such as consumer goods packaging, logistics, and commercial printing across its core market.
BZAI vs ITP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.8M | $25.6M |
| Net Profit | $-3.3M | $-1.4M |
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | 7.9% |
| Operating Margin | -89.8% | -3.9% |
| Net Margin | -13.9% | -5.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 2377500.0% | 2.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 50.7% | 26.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.16 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $23.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9M | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $24.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $26.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-26.3M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-77.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.7M |
| Q4 25 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.0% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | -89.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -190.3% | -3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -31.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -21.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -51.0% |
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -221.3% | -5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -32.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -22.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -54.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.25 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $45.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $4.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $39.0M | $152.0M |
| Total Assets | $102.2M | $175.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.03× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.4M |
| Q4 25 | $39.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | $152.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $152.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $152.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $156.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $164.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $163.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $164.3M |
| Q4 25 | $102.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.9M | $175.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $175.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $175.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $177.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $190.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $191.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $177.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.07× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-16.5M | $1.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-16.5M | $1.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -69.6% | 5.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $3.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-16.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-24.9M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $721.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $624.4K |
| Q4 25 | $-16.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-24.9M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $668.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $615.4K |
| Q4 25 | -69.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -210.2% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -22.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
