vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Blaize Holdings, Inc. (BZAI) and SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC (SD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($39.4M vs $23.8M, roughly 1.7× Blaize Holdings, Inc.). SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC runs the higher net margin — 54.9% vs -13.9%, a 68.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Blaize Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2377500.0% vs 1.1%). SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.4M vs $-16.5M).
Blaize Holdings, Inc. is a technology company specializing in edge artificial intelligence computing solutions. It designs energy-efficient AI processors, low-latency inference software stacks, and end-to-end edge AI development tools, serving key segments including autonomous driving, industrial automation, smart cities, and edge healthcare monitoring.
SandRidge Energy, Inc. is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Mid-Continent region of the United States. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
BZAI vs SD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.8M | $39.4M |
| Net Profit | $-3.3M | $21.6M |
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -89.8% | 38.5% |
| Net Margin | -13.9% | 54.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 2377500.0% | 1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 50.7% | 23.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.16 | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $23.8M | $39.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9M | $39.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $30.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.3M | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-26.3M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.1M |
| Q4 25 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -89.8% | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -190.3% | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 53.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | 54.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -221.3% | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 56.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.16 | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.25 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $45.8M | $111.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $39.0M | $510.9M |
| Total Assets | $102.2M | $644.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.8M | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $101.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $102.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $99.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $98.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $92.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $209.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $207.0M |
| Q4 25 | $39.0M | $510.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | $492.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $480.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $464.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $460.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $446.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $424.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $419.7M |
| Q4 25 | $102.2M | $644.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.9M | $619.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $602.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $588.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $581.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $565.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $529.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $527.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-16.5M | $31.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-16.5M | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -69.6% | 36.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | 43.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $41.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-16.5M | $31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-24.9M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $20.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $15.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-16.5M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-24.9M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | -69.6% | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -210.2% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BZAI
Segment breakdown not available.
SD
| Oil Reserves | $19.0M | 48% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $11.6M | 30% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $8.7M | 22% |