vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BEAZER HOMES USA INC (BZH) and STEVEN MADDEN, LTD. (SHOO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STEVEN MADDEN, LTD. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($749.8M vs $409.8M, roughly 1.8× BEAZER HOMES USA INC). On growth, STEVEN MADDEN, LTD. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (29.5% vs -47.0%). Over the past eight quarters, STEVEN MADDEN, LTD.'s revenue compounded faster (16.7% CAGR vs -28.7%).
Beazer Homes USA, Inc. is a home construction company based in Atlanta, Georgia. In 2016, the company was the 11th largest home builder in the United States based on the number of homes closed. The company operates in 13 states.
Steven Madden, Ltd. is a publicly traded company that designs and markets shoes and fashion accessories. Based in Long Island City, New York, the company's brands include Dolce Vita, Betsey Johnson, Blondo, BB Dakota and Mad Love. Steve Madden is also a licensee of various brands, including Anne Klein and Superga.
BZH vs SHOO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $409.8M | $749.8M |
| Net Profit | — | $24.7M |
| Gross Margin | 11.9% | 42.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 4.8% |
| Net Margin | — | 3.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -47.0% | 29.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -34.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $0.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | $409.8M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $363.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $363.5M | $749.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $791.9M | $664.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $545.4M | $556.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $565.3M | $551.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.0M | $578.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $806.2M | $621.2M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-32.6M | $24.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.0M | $20.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-324.0K | $-38.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.8M | $41.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $37.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.1M | $55.3M |
| Q2 26 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.2% | 42.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.5% | 41.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.3% | 40.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | 41.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.4% | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.5% | 41.8% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -8.8% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.7% | -7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | 12.0% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -9.0% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.1% | -7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.7% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | 8.9% |
| Q2 26 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $-1.13 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.13 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.01 | $0.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.56 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.42 | $0.57 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.10 | $0.49 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.69 | $0.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $116.4M | $112.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $866.4M |
| Total Assets | $2.8B | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $120.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $120.8M | $112.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $214.7M | $140.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $82.9M | $111.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $85.1M | $147.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.4M | $203.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $203.9M | $11.1M |
| Q2 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $866.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $850.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $833.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $875.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $847.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $833.9M |
| Q2 26 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $91.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $80.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 10.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.70× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $119.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-165.3M | $91.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $250.2M | $23.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-62.3M | $66.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-159.4M | $103.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $185.4M | $444.0K |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-170.9M | $80.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $242.7M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-70.2M | $58.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.4M | $-28.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-164.6M | $94.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $179.8M | $-6.9M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -47.0% | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.6% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.9% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.8% | -5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -35.1% | 16.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | -1.1% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 1.2% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.34× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.27× | -0.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | -50.92× | 2.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.56× | 0.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BZH
| West region | $231.3M | 56% |
| East region | $90.8M | 22% |
| Southeast region | $75.7M | 18% |
| Land sales and other | $12.1M | 3% |
SHOO
Segment breakdown not available.
