vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Baozun Inc. (BZUN) and Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd (DDL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($115.3M vs $84.2M, roughly 1.4× Baozun Inc.). Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd runs the higher net margin — 5.8% vs -2.0%, a 7.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Baozun Inc is a leading digital commerce service provider focused on the Chinese market. It delivers full-stack e-commerce solutions including official store operation, digital marketing, logistics and fulfillment, customer support, and technical infrastructure services for global and local consumer brands across fashion, beauty, FMCG, consumer electronics, and other core retail segments.
Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd operates a leading on-demand grocery e-commerce platform primarily serving the Chinese market. It provides fresh produce, daily necessities, ready-to-eat meals, and household staples to urban consumers, leveraging optimized supply chains and localized logistics networks to offer fast, reliable 30-minute delivery services, prioritizing product freshness and user convenience.
BZUN vs DDL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 2025 vs Q3 2022
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $84.2M | $115.3M |
| Net Profit | $-1.7M | $6.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -1.7% | 5.3% |
| Net Margin | -2.0% | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $84.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.0K | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $80.1M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $115.3M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $136.7M | ||
| Q1 22 | — | $118.5M |
| Q2 25 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.7K | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $717.6K | ||
| Q1 22 | — | $10.4M |
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 22 | — | 8.2% |
| Q2 25 | -2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -2.2% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 22 | — | 8.8% |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-0.00 | ||
| Q1 22 | — | $-0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $6.9M | $113.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $135.8K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.7M | $4.5M |
| Total Assets | $25.9M | $178.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.03× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.6K | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $60.0M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $113.7M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $124.9M | ||
| Q1 22 | — | $105.6M |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $135.8K | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $322.0K | ||
| Q1 22 | — | $527.9K |
| Q2 25 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.2K | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $80.0M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q1 22 | — | $5.9M |
| Q2 25 | $25.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $188.8K | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $195.7M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $178.3M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $194.3M | ||
| Q1 22 | — | $187.7M |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q1 22 | — | 0.09× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
