vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of CACI INTERNATIONAL INC (CACI) and W. W. Grainger (GWW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

W. W. Grainger is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.7B vs $2.4B, roughly 2.0× CACI INTERNATIONAL INC). W. W. Grainger runs the higher net margin — 11.7% vs 5.5%, a 6.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, W. W. Grainger posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.1% vs 8.5%). W. W. Grainger produced more free cash flow last quarter ($569.0M vs $221.4M). Over the past eight quarters, CACI INTERNATIONAL INC's revenue compounded faster (7.4% CAGR vs 4.9%).

CACI International Inc is a U.S.-headquartered multinational professional services and information technology firm. It delivers custom technology solutions, cybersecurity services, data analytics, and mission-critical operational support to government defense, intelligence, civilian agencies, and select private sector clients.

W. W. Grainger, Inc. is an American Fortune 500 industrial supply company founded in 1927 in Chicago by the company's namesake William W. (Bill) Grainger. He founded the company to provide consumers with access to a consistent supply of motors. The company now serves more than 4.5 million customers worldwide with offerings such as motors, lighting, material handling, fasteners, plumbing, tools, and safety supplies, along with inventory management services and technical support.

CACI vs GWW — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
GWW
GWW
2.0× larger
GWW
$4.7B
$2.4B
CACI
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
GWW
GWW
+1.6% gap
GWW
10.1%
8.5%
CACI
Higher net margin
GWW
GWW
6.2% more per $
GWW
11.7%
5.5%
CACI
More free cash flow
GWW
GWW
$347.6M more FCF
GWW
$569.0M
$221.4M
CACI
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
CACI
CACI
Annualised
CACI
7.4%
4.9%
GWW

Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
CACI
CACI
GWW
GWW
Revenue
$2.4B
$4.7B
Net Profit
$130.4M
$555.0M
Gross Margin
40.0%
Operating Margin
9.7%
16.7%
Net Margin
5.5%
11.7%
Revenue YoY
8.5%
10.1%
Net Profit YoY
16.6%
15.9%
EPS (diluted)
$5.88
$11.65

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CACI
CACI
GWW
GWW
Q1 26
$2.4B
$4.7B
Q4 25
$2.2B
$4.4B
Q3 25
$2.3B
$4.7B
Q2 25
$2.3B
$4.6B
Q1 25
$2.2B
$4.3B
Q4 24
$2.1B
$4.2B
Q3 24
$2.1B
$4.4B
Q2 24
$2.0B
$4.3B
Net Profit
CACI
CACI
GWW
GWW
Q1 26
$130.4M
$555.0M
Q4 25
$123.9M
$451.0M
Q3 25
$124.8M
$294.0M
Q2 25
$157.9M
$482.0M
Q1 25
$111.9M
$479.0M
Q4 24
$109.9M
$475.0M
Q3 24
$120.2M
$486.0M
Q2 24
$134.7M
$470.0M
Gross Margin
CACI
CACI
GWW
GWW
Q1 26
40.0%
Q4 25
39.5%
Q3 25
38.6%
Q2 25
38.5%
Q1 25
39.7%
Q4 24
39.6%
Q3 24
39.2%
Q2 24
39.3%
Operating Margin
CACI
CACI
GWW
GWW
Q1 26
9.7%
16.7%
Q4 25
9.3%
14.3%
Q3 25
9.3%
11.0%
Q2 25
9.0%
14.9%
Q1 25
9.1%
15.6%
Q4 24
8.6%
15.0%
Q3 24
8.7%
15.6%
Q2 24
9.7%
15.1%
Net Margin
CACI
CACI
GWW
GWW
Q1 26
5.5%
11.7%
Q4 25
5.6%
10.2%
Q3 25
5.5%
6.3%
Q2 25
6.9%
10.6%
Q1 25
5.2%
11.1%
Q4 24
5.2%
11.2%
Q3 24
5.8%
11.1%
Q2 24
6.6%
10.9%
EPS (diluted)
CACI
CACI
GWW
GWW
Q1 26
$5.88
$11.65
Q4 25
$5.59
$9.45
Q3 25
$5.63
$6.12
Q2 25
$7.11
$9.97
Q1 25
$5.00
$9.86
Q4 24
$4.88
$9.71
Q3 24
$5.33
$9.87
Q2 24
$5.97
$9.51

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CACI
CACI
GWW
GWW
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$158.0M
$695.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$5.2B
$2.4B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$4.3B
$4.3B
Total Assets
$11.6B
$9.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.21×
0.55×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CACI
CACI
GWW
GWW
Q1 26
$158.0M
$695.0M
Q4 25
$423.0M
$585.0M
Q3 25
$133.0M
$535.0M
Q2 25
$106.2M
$597.0M
Q1 25
$223.9M
$666.0M
Q4 24
$175.7M
$1.0B
Q3 24
$440.7M
$1.4B
Q2 24
$134.0M
$769.0M
Total Debt
CACI
CACI
GWW
GWW
Q1 26
$5.2B
$2.4B
Q4 25
$3.0B
$2.5B
Q3 25
$2.8B
$2.4B
Q2 25
$2.9B
$2.3B
Q1 25
$3.1B
$2.3B
Q4 24
$3.1B
$2.8B
Q3 24
$1.8B
$2.3B
Q2 24
$1.5B
$1.8B
Stockholders' Equity
CACI
CACI
GWW
GWW
Q1 26
$4.3B
$4.3B
Q4 25
$4.1B
$3.7B
Q3 25
$4.0B
$3.6B
Q2 25
$3.9B
$3.7B
Q1 25
$3.7B
$3.5B
Q4 24
$3.7B
$3.4B
Q3 24
$3.7B
$3.5B
Q2 24
$3.5B
$3.3B
Total Assets
CACI
CACI
GWW
GWW
Q1 26
$11.6B
$9.5B
Q4 25
$8.9B
$9.0B
Q3 25
$8.7B
$8.8B
Q2 25
$8.6B
$8.9B
Q1 25
$8.6B
$8.7B
Q4 24
$8.5B
$8.8B
Q3 24
$7.2B
$9.1B
Q2 24
$6.8B
$8.4B
Debt / Equity
CACI
CACI
GWW
GWW
Q1 26
1.21×
0.55×
Q4 25
0.72×
0.67×
Q3 25
0.69×
0.67×
Q2 25
0.75×
0.64×
Q1 25
0.84×
0.66×
Q4 24
0.82×
0.83×
Q3 24
0.50×
0.65×
Q2 24
0.44×
0.54×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CACI
CACI
GWW
GWW
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$508.4M
$739.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$221.4M
$569.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
9.4%
12.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.5%
3.6%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
3.90×
1.33×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$641.7M
$1.4B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CACI
CACI
GWW
GWW
Q1 26
$508.4M
$739.0M
Q4 25
$154.2M
$395.0M
Q3 25
$171.1M
$597.0M
Q2 25
$156.0M
$377.0M
Q1 25
$230.3M
$646.0M
Q4 24
$126.0M
$428.0M
Q3 24
$34.7M
$611.0M
Q2 24
$157.2M
$411.0M
Free Cash Flow
CACI
CACI
GWW
GWW
Q1 26
$221.4M
$569.0M
Q4 25
$138.2M
$269.0M
Q3 25
$154.1M
$339.0M
Q2 25
$128.0M
$202.0M
Q1 25
$214.1M
$521.0M
Q4 24
$116.1M
$170.0M
Q3 24
$23.2M
$523.0M
Q2 24
$134.6M
$335.0M
FCF Margin
CACI
CACI
GWW
GWW
Q1 26
9.4%
12.0%
Q4 25
6.2%
6.1%
Q3 25
6.7%
7.3%
Q2 25
5.6%
4.4%
Q1 25
9.9%
12.1%
Q4 24
5.5%
4.0%
Q3 24
1.1%
11.9%
Q2 24
6.6%
7.8%
Capex Intensity
CACI
CACI
GWW
GWW
Q1 26
2.5%
3.6%
Q4 25
0.7%
2.8%
Q3 25
0.7%
5.5%
Q2 25
1.2%
3.8%
Q1 25
0.7%
2.9%
Q4 24
0.5%
6.1%
Q3 24
0.6%
2.0%
Q2 24
1.1%
1.8%
Cash Conversion
CACI
CACI
GWW
GWW
Q1 26
3.90×
1.33×
Q4 25
1.24×
0.88×
Q3 25
1.37×
2.03×
Q2 25
0.99×
0.78×
Q1 25
2.06×
1.35×
Q4 24
1.15×
0.90×
Q3 24
0.29×
1.26×
Q2 24
1.17×
0.87×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons