vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CHEESECAKE FACTORY INC (CAKE) and Teradyne (TER). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Teradyne is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $961.6M, roughly 1.1× CHEESECAKE FACTORY INC). Teradyne runs the higher net margin — 23.7% vs 3.0%, a 20.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Teradyne posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (43.9% vs -73.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Teradyne's revenue compounded faster (34.4% CAGR vs 7.6%).
The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated is an American restaurant company and distributor of cheesecakes based in the United States. It operates 370 full-service restaurants: 218 under the Cheesecake Factory brand, 47 under the North Italia brand, and 105 under other brands. The Cheesecake Factory also operates two bakery production facilities—in Calabasas, California, and Rocky Mount, North Carolina.
Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts. Its high-profile customers include Samsung, Qualcomm, Intel, Analog Devices, Texas Instruments and IBM.
CAKE vs TER — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $961.6M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $28.8M | $257.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 57.2% |
| Operating Margin | 3.5% | 27.1% |
| Net Margin | 3.0% | 23.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -73.2% | 43.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -30.1% | 75.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.60 | $1.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $961.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $907.2M | $769.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $927.2M | $651.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $685.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $865.5M | $752.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $904.0M | $737.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $891.2M | $729.9M |
| Q1 26 | $28.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $257.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.9M | $119.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.9M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $98.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.0M | $146.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.4M | $145.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.2M | $186.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 57.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 57.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 59.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 59.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 58.3% |
| Q1 26 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.6% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.5% | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 25.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.60 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.66 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.67 | $0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.61 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.61 | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.08 | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.68 | $1.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $215.7M | $293.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $2.8B |
| Total Assets | — | $4.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $215.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $293.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.0M | $272.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $135.4M | $339.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $475.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $52.2M | $553.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.7M | $510.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.2M | $421.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $425.3M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $339.4M | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $396.4M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $374.0M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.4M | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $3.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $281.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $218.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 20.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.09× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $450.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $281.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $147.5M | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.9M | $182.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $161.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.9M | $282.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.7M | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.7M | $216.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $69.2M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.1M | $131.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $97.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.7M | $225.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.5M | $114.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.6M | $171.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.2% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 23.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.6% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 6.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.62× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.40× | 2.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.66× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.53× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.01× | 1.16× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CAKE
Segment breakdown not available.
TER
| Soc | $646.5M | 60% |
| Memory | $206.5M | 19% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $90.0M | 8% |
| Universal Robots | $89.4M | 8% |
| IST | $30.5M | 3% |
| Transferred Over Time | $20.5M | 2% |
