vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CALERES INC (CAL) and CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CALERES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($790.1M vs $633.7M, roughly 1.2× CENTURY ALUMINUM CO). CALERES INC runs the higher net margin — 0.3% vs 0.3%, a 0.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CALERES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.6% vs 0.4%). CENTURY ALUMINUM CO produced more free cash flow last quarter ($67.7M vs $-12.4M). Over the past eight quarters, CENTURY ALUMINUM CO's revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Caleres Inc. is an American footwear company that owns and operates a variety of footwear brands. Its headquarters is located in Clayton, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis. The company was founded in 1878 as Bryan, Brown & Company in St. Louis, though it underwent several name changes. The Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company was the largest manufacturer of shoes in America in the early 20th century, but it went bankrupt in June 1939.
Century Aluminum Company is a US-based producer of primary aluminum, with aluminum plants in Kentucky, South Carolina and Iceland. It is the largest producer of primary aluminum in the United States. The company is a publicly held corporation listed on the NASDAQ. The headquarters is at One South Wacker in Chicago.
CAL vs CENX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $790.1M | $633.7M |
| Net Profit | $2.4M | $1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 41.8% | 13.0% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 5.2% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -94.2% | -96.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $790.1M | $633.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $658.5M | $632.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $614.2M | $628.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $639.2M | $633.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $740.9M | $630.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $683.3M | $539.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $659.2M | $560.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $697.1M | $489.5M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $29.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.4M | $45.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.0M | $47.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $246.8M |
| Q4 25 | 41.8% | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.4% | 12.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.4% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.0% | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.1% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.9% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.9% | 3.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.4% | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | -0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 50.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.21 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | $0.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $0.58 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.85 | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.88 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.56 | $2.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.0M | $134.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $616.8M | $805.6M |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.0M | $134.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.5M | $151.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.1M | $40.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.6M | $44.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.7M | $32.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.7M | $41.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.4M | $93.5M |
| Q4 25 | $616.8M | $805.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.3M | $741.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $605.2M | $724.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $599.0M | $726.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $598.3M | $694.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $606.1M | $628.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $570.3M | $601.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $560.6M | $601.5M |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $1.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.2M | $102.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.4M | $67.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.6% | 10.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 5.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.50× | 57.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.4M | $84.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $102.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.3M | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $72.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-39.8M | $-41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.6M | $20.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.1M | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.0M | $-14.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.4M | $67.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.0M | $-18.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.2M | $-15.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0M | $51.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-57.4M | $-54.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.5M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.3M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.4M | $-44.5M |
| Q4 25 | -1.6% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | -2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | -2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.7% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | -9.1% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | -0.50× | 57.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.05× | 0.13× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.82× | 2.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.96× | -0.92× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.66× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.17× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.77× | -0.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CAL
| Brand Portfolio | $383.7M | 49% |
| Landed Wholesale | $148.1M | 19% |
| Wholesale E Commerce | $75.0M | 9% |
| Ecommerce | $68.8M | 9% |
| Stuart Weitzman Brand | $45.8M | 6% |
| Landed Wholesale Ecommerce Drop Ship | $30.6M | 4% |
| First Cost Wholesale | $14.9M | 2% |
| Clt Brand Solutions | $10.2M | 1% |
| License And Royalty | $2.1M | 0% |
CENX
| Aluminum | $566.3M | 89% |
| Alumina | $67.4M | 11% |
