vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CALERES INC (CAL) and Evergy (EVRG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Evergy is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $790.1M, roughly 1.6× CALERES INC). Evergy runs the higher net margin — 6.5% vs 0.3%, a 6.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CALERES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.6% vs 5.3%). CALERES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-12.4M vs $-530.5M). Over the past eight quarters, CALERES INC's revenue compounded faster (6.5% CAGR vs 0.4%).
Caleres Inc. is an American footwear company that owns and operates a variety of footwear brands. Its headquarters is located in Clayton, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis. The company was founded in 1878 as Bryan, Brown & Company in St. Louis, though it underwent several name changes. The Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company was the largest manufacturer of shoes in America in the early 20th century, but it went bankrupt in June 1939.
Evergy, Inc. is an American investor-owned utility (IOU) with publicly traded stock with headquarters in Topeka, Kansas, and in Kansas City, Missouri. The company was formed from a merger of Westar Energy of Topeka and Great Plains Energy of Kansas City, parent company of Kansas City Power & Light. Evergy is the largest electric company in Kansas, serving more than 1.7 million residential, commercial and industrial customers in Kansas and Missouri.
CAL vs EVRG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $790.1M | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $2.4M | $84.3M |
| Gross Margin | 41.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 18.5% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 6.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | 5.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -94.2% | 7.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $0.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $790.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $658.5M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $614.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $639.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $740.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $683.3M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $659.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $697.1M | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $84.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $475.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | $171.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $125.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.4M | $78.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.0M | $465.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9M | $207.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $122.7M |
| Q4 25 | 41.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 18.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 37.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 22.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | 18.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 35.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.4% | 20.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 12.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 26.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 9.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $2.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.21 | $0.74 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | $0.54 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.85 | $2.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.88 | $0.90 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.56 | $0.53 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.0M | $19.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $616.8M | $10.2B |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $33.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.0M | $19.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.5M | $27.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.1M | $27.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.6M | $35.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.7M | $22.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.8M | $34.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.7M | $26.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.4M | $63.7M |
| Q4 25 | $616.8M | $10.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.3M | $10.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $605.2M | $10.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $599.0M | $9.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $598.3M | $10.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $606.1M | $10.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $570.3M | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $560.6M | $9.6B |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $33.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $33.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $32.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $32.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $32.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $32.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $31.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $31.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.2M | $334.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.4M | $-530.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.6% | -41.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 66.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.50× | 3.96× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.4M | $-751.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $334.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.3M | $937.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $323.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $449.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-39.8M | $395.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.6M | $953.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.1M | $317.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.0M | $317.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.4M | $-530.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.0M | $225.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.2M | $-303.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0M | $-143.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-57.4M | $-118.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.5M | $427.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.3M | $-360.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.4M | $-301.3M |
| Q4 25 | -1.6% | -41.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | -22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | -11.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.7% | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | -25.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | -23.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 66.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 40.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 46.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 45.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 41.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 29.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 48.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 48.3% |
| Q4 25 | -0.50× | 3.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.05× | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.81× | 1.89× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.82× | 3.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.96× | 5.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.66× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.17× | 1.53× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.77× | 2.59× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CAL
| Brand Portfolio | $383.7M | 49% |
| Landed Wholesale | $148.1M | 19% |
| Wholesale E Commerce | $75.0M | 9% |
| Ecommerce | $68.8M | 9% |
| Stuart Weitzman Brand | $45.8M | 6% |
| Landed Wholesale Ecommerce Drop Ship | $30.6M | 4% |
| First Cost Wholesale | $14.9M | 2% |
| Clt Brand Solutions | $10.2M | 1% |
| License And Royalty | $2.1M | 0% |
EVRG
| Electric Utility Customer Class Residential | $462.9M | 36% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Commercial | $447.6M | 35% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Industrial | $164.1M | 13% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Transmission | $129.4M | 10% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Wholesale | $69.7M | 5% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Other Retail | $12.2M | 1% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Industrial Steam | $5.7M | 0% |
